Promoting Health via mHealth Applications Using a French Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale: Adaptation and Validation Study

Abstract

Background In the recent decades, the number of apps promoting health behaviors and health-related strategies and interventions has increased alongside the number of smartphone users. Nevertheless, the validity process for measuring and reporting app quality remains unsatisfactory for health professionals and end users and represents a public health concern. The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) is a tool validated and widely used in the scientific literature to evaluate and compare mHealth app functionalities. However, MARS is not adapted to the French culture nor to the language. Objective This study aims to translate, adapt, and validate the equivalent French version of MARS (ie, MARS-F). Methods The original MARS was first translated to French by two independent bilingual scientists, and their common version was blind back-translated twice by two native English speakers, culminating in a final well-established MARS-F. Its comprehensibility was then evaluated by 6 individuals (3 researchers and 3 nonacademics), and the final MARS-F version was created. Two bilingual raters independently completed the evaluation of 63 apps using MARS and MARS-F. Interrater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. In addition, internal consistency and validity of both scales were assessed. Mokken scale analysis was used to investigate the scalability of both MARS and MARS-F. Results MARS-F had a good alignment with the original MARS, with properties comparable between the two scales. The correlation coefficients (r) between the corresponding dimensions of MARS and MARS-F ranged from 0.97 to 0.99. The internal consistencies of the MARS-F dimensions engagement (ω=0.79), functionality (ω=0.79), esthetics (ω=0.78), and information quality (ω=0.61) were acceptable and that for the overall MARS score (ω=0.86) was good. Mokken scale analysis revealed a strong scalability for MARS (Loevinger H=0.37) and a good scalability for MARS-F (H=0.35). Conclusions MARS-F is a valid tool, and it would serve as a crucial aid for researchers, health care professionals, public health authorities, and interested third parties, to assess the quality of mHealth apps in French-speaking countries.

Nutrition-Related Mobile Apps in the French App Stores: Assessment of Functionality and Quality

“…We asked 8 dieticians and nutritionists ( Multimedia Appendix 1 ) to rate the apps. All raters viewed a training video in French (available upon request to the corresponding author) developed for the MARS-F [ 22 ], adapted from the English-language training video [ 20 ]. To train, all raters evaluated 2 apps that had been excluded.…”

Oral-Hygiene-Related Mobile Apps in the French App Stores: Assessment of Functionality and Quality

“…The French version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS-F) [ 35 ] adapted from the original English version MARS was used [ 36 ]. The first part of the MARS scale, called “App classification”, was reviewed by the two academic researchers.…”

“…Before beginning to evaluate apps related to oral hygiene, raters had to be trained to use the MARS-F scale. For this purpose, all raters had at their disposal a French training video (available on request from the corresponding author) developed for the MARS-F grid [ 35 ] and adapted from the English training video by Stoyanov et al [ 36 ]. This video presented each item and the answers with examples.…”

Development and Validation of Technology for Teaching Basic Life Support in Cardio-Respiratory Arrest

“…Applications that teach interventions in situations involving imminent risk of death should be based on the best available evidence. In addition, rigorous validation of content by experts and ensuring usability standards are indispensable [27][28] .…”

“…In this direction, the SBVida Mobile Application was structured based on the recommendations of the American Heart Association and validated by specialists in Intensive Care and Urgency/Emergency [28][29] . As for the usability, it provides information and indicators that guide conducts for the identification of a possible victim in CRA and directs to the CPR procedures until the implementation of more complex conducts in a specialized care unit.…”