Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design

Abstract

SummaryAlthough new theoretical models that are suggestive of how work design might be used to foster proactive motivation and proactive performance have been proposed, these models need further elaboration and testing if they are to be useful tools for contemporary organizations. Accordingly, we examine the extent to which feelings of responsibility for constructive change is a proactive psychological mechanism that explains how work design characteristics influence constructive change-oriented behavior and proactive performance. Specifically, we examine job autonomy, position in the organizational hierarchy, access to resources, access to strategy-related information, and role ambiguity as antecedents to felt responsibility for constructive change (FRCC). We also examine the extent to which feelings of responsibility for constructive change are positively related to voice behavior (i.e., constructive, change-oriented communication) and continuous improvement (i.e., proactive role performance). Results indicate hierarchical position and access to resources are positively related to FRCC. Results also indicate proactive personality moderates the relationship between access to resources and FRCC and the relationship between access to strategy-related information and FRCC. Plots of the interactions reveal that these relationships are enhanced for individuals with proactive personalities. The results also indicate that FRCC is positively related to voice behavior and continuous improvement. Perhaps more importantly, the results suggest that FRCC explains the psychological process by which structural and socio-structural forces influence proactive behavior. The results are discussed as they pertain to updated work design theory and theories of high involvement work systems, job characteristics, and leadership prototypes.

Keep the fire burning: Reciprocal gains of basic need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and innovative work behaviour

“…In the light of innovative work, satisfying the need for autonomy seems particularly relevant as people who engage in IWB aim to challenge the status quo and actively seek to initiate change. Interestingly, empirical evidence indicates that experiencing autonomy is conducive to several innovation-related activities as previous work has demonstrated positive associations between autonomy at work and idea suggestion efforts (Axtell et al, 2000;Krause, 2004), voice behaviours (Fuller, Marler, & Hester, 2006) and idea implementation activities (Frese et al, 1999).…”

Job crafting and its relationships with person–job fit and meaningfulness: A three-wave study

“…Not surprisingly, there is a robust knowledge base available for managers in order to design jobs that are likely to be experienced as motivating and meaningful by the workers (Humphrey, Nahrgang, & Morgeson, 2007). At the same time, scholars call attention to the fact that the job design is not only influenced by managers but by employees as well (Fuller, Marler, & Hester, 2006;Staw &Especially in the context of the changing nature of work, job crafting may be important. For example, when organizations restructure by means of outsourcing production processes or when they embrace the concept of new ways of working and allow employees to work from other places than the office, these changes are likely to affect the work environment.…”

Structural, Level and Typological Properties of the Psychological Aspect of Professional Responsibility of Pharmaceutical Industry Workers

“…Crystal [32]. As understood from Table 1, the evidence of the personal level characteristics of professional responsibility is inversely proportional to that of the operational and social levels in the reflectiveaxiological aspect.…”