2005
DOI: 10.1207/s14241250ijmm0701&2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting Diversity and Pluralism in Contemporary Communication Policies in the United States and the United Kingdom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The three value chains identified here confirm that “a commitment to media pluralism is now at the heart of communication policy” (Freedman, 2005, p. 19). However, unlike in the EU (Wheeler, 2004, p. 352), in which Norway is not a member, pluralism appears to be a subordinate operative goal—cause to an effect and means to an end—as indicated by Østbye, not the ultimate end itself as asserted by Syvertsen.…”
Section: Identifying the Media Policy Objectivessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The three value chains identified here confirm that “a commitment to media pluralism is now at the heart of communication policy” (Freedman, 2005, p. 19). However, unlike in the EU (Wheeler, 2004, p. 352), in which Norway is not a member, pluralism appears to be a subordinate operative goal—cause to an effect and means to an end—as indicated by Østbye, not the ultimate end itself as asserted by Syvertsen.…”
Section: Identifying the Media Policy Objectivessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Mediemangfold oppnås når stemmer fra et bredest mulig politisk spektrum er representert i mediebildet (Benson, 2009;Freedman, 2005;Kaitatzi-Whitlock, 1996;Ots, 2009). Mediereguleringen har først og fremst som målsetning å sikre at «senderne » i medielandskapet er tilstrekkelig ulike til at et slikt innholds-og kildemangfold kan oppstå (Picard, 1985, s. 76).…”
Section: Mangfold Av Stemmer I Nyheteneunclassified