2020
DOI: 10.1108/jrit-08-2020-0041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting critical thinking through an evidence-based skills fair intervention

Abstract: PurposeThe lack of critical thinking in new graduates has been a concern to the nursing profession. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an innovative, evidence-based skills fair intervention on nursing students' achievements and perceptions of critical thinking skills development.Design/methodology/approachThe explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed for this study.FindingsThe findings indicated participants perceived the intervention as a strategy for developing critica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PBL students' performed better in the total and all subdivisions like analysis, evaluation, inference, deduction, and induction than the LBP. The T-test was analyzed for significance in the deferences of the CCTST and the scores between the teams in the [15]. The participants were rotated between the groups discussing topics related to the fundamental health subject that contains, medication administration by using intramuscular and subcutaneous injections technique, administration of intravenous medication, physical assessment for adults, Foley catheter insertion, nasogastric insertion and feeding, skin assessment and Braden scale for bed sores, vital signs measurements for adults, and a patient safety goals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PBL students' performed better in the total and all subdivisions like analysis, evaluation, inference, deduction, and induction than the LBP. The T-test was analyzed for significance in the deferences of the CCTST and the scores between the teams in the [15]. The participants were rotated between the groups discussing topics related to the fundamental health subject that contains, medication administration by using intramuscular and subcutaneous injections technique, administration of intravenous medication, physical assessment for adults, Foley catheter insertion, nasogastric insertion and feeding, skin assessment and Braden scale for bed sores, vital signs measurements for adults, and a patient safety goals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to think critically by the students has an important element in assuming, identifying thinking critical skills, comparing critical thinking abilities based on students' opinions, and performing actions and movements to change old habits by promoting the application of new habits properly (Brookfield, 2012). A study on the ability to think critically is intended to give students an understanding of building hypotheses or assumptions, seeing from data and facts to be identified, tracing figures and experts to compare, and making movements as a form of application of student work as their ability to critical thinking present day required life skill (Brookfield, 2018;Gonzalez et al, 2022). Thus, the citizen project learning model is suitable for improving students' critical thinking skills through six learning steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EM2: Critical thinking [31]. Critical thinking is an individual's ability to reasonably seek, predict, and transform knowledge [32].…”
Section: Students' Entrepreneurial Mindsetmentioning
confidence: 99%