1990
DOI: 10.1177/108056999005300205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting Creative Tension Within Collaborative Writing Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these problems include personality differences and unresolved emotional issues, such as differing personal needs, work styles, and agendas. Ewald and MacCallum (1990) discussed the tension that exists between the individual and the group in collaborative writing exercises. This tension can be both positive and negative because individual traits can influence group dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these problems include personality differences and unresolved emotional issues, such as differing personal needs, work styles, and agendas. Ewald and MacCallum (1990) discussed the tension that exists between the individual and the group in collaborative writing exercises. This tension can be both positive and negative because individual traits can influence group dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other benefits that industry practitioners attribute to use of teams include promotion of creative tension (Ewald and MacCallum, 1990) and stress reduction, less isolation, better flow of information, and more cooperative spirit (Cox, 1989).…”
Section: Teams In Industrymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…I am suggesting that they be introduced to the theory regarding academic organizations (Bensimon, Neumann, and Birnbaum, 1989;Bergquist, 1992;Birnbaum, 1988;Green 1988bGreen , 1988cMashland, 1985;Tierney, 1988Tierney, , 1990, including shared decision making (Bensimon, 1991;Mortimer and McConnell, 1978;Neumann, 1991;Powers and Powers, 1984;Yamada, 1991). In fact, the literature on collaborative group work in the classroom could be consulted profitably to gain insights into group processes (Ewald and MacCallum, 1990;Flower and Ackerman, 1994;Flower, Wallace, Norris, and Burnett, 1994;George, 1984;Higgins, Flower, and Petraglia, 1990;Hulbert, 1994;Jehn, 1997;Nelson and Smith, 1990;Plowman, 1993). That literature, which is taken largely from publications on collaborative writing (Speck, Johnson, Dice, and Heaton, 1999), is especially useful because groups are often called on to produce documents recommending certain actions.…”
Section: What Professors Domentioning
confidence: 99%