2006
DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2006.10765038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting and Archiving Student Work through an Institutional Repository: Trinity University, LASR, and the Digital Commons

Abstract: The authors discuss the development of a related set of institutional repositories among several liberal arts college libraries. Contrary to the usual focus on faculty publications, the primary goal of these repositories is the promotion of student work, especially undergraduate theses. Discussion of issues concerning selection of materials and archival policies is included along with practical considerations of workflows and reflections on the advantages and disadvantages of the particular software platform (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As faculty attitudes toward open access and IRs have been slow to shift toward acceptance, many librarians have developed strategies focusing on student engagement (Hahn & Wyatt, 2014;Watson, 2007;Yang & Li, 2015). An early study by Nolan and Costanza (2006) details success stories by several liberal arts college libraries that expanded on thesis deposit to include additional student works, leading to librarians gaining opportunities to directly interact with students in the classroom on "issues surrounding copyright, fair use, licensing, and alternative publishing models" (p. 92). A more recent study by Rozum and Thoms (2016) explores both student and faculty benefits of capturing undergraduate student scholarship in an IR, in particular posters and data sets that are often discarded after they have been presented or used to reach initial findings, but that offer enduring value to external communities when made available OA (pp.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As faculty attitudes toward open access and IRs have been slow to shift toward acceptance, many librarians have developed strategies focusing on student engagement (Hahn & Wyatt, 2014;Watson, 2007;Yang & Li, 2015). An early study by Nolan and Costanza (2006) details success stories by several liberal arts college libraries that expanded on thesis deposit to include additional student works, leading to librarians gaining opportunities to directly interact with students in the classroom on "issues surrounding copyright, fair use, licensing, and alternative publishing models" (p. 92). A more recent study by Rozum and Thoms (2016) explores both student and faculty benefits of capturing undergraduate student scholarship in an IR, in particular posters and data sets that are often discarded after they have been presented or used to reach initial findings, but that offer enduring value to external communities when made available OA (pp.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical to the present study and the information literacy ramifications of OA theses, Connell analyzes the use of items in the Ohio State University Knowledge Bank and finds that journal articles and undergraduate theses are the most used materials (2011,266). Nolan and Costanza (2006) discuss the incentives and challenges of focusing on student work in the IR. They had an information literacy-related ulterior motive for putting senior theses into the repository: "We wanted students -and eventually faculty -to develop some conception of the issues surrounding copyright, fair use, licensing, and alternative publishing models" (Nolan and Costanza 2006, 92).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general discussion of procedures for including student work can be found in Nolan and Costanza (2006) and Pickton and McKnight (2007), who both address the concerns facing administrators responsible for IR content relating to posting of student work and the issues involved. These issues include creating specific guidelines for purpose, scope and format of IRs and standards for academic submissions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%