2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting active learning in high school chemistry: learning achievement and attitude

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the overall mastery level of scientific argumentation for the three sub concepts was still at moderate and weak levels, regardless of the argumentative activities. These are in line with the findings by Bradley and Mosimega (1998) and Sesen and Tarhan (2010), which stated that student's performance in those concepts was less satisfactory. This may be due to their lack of scientific knowledge in the concepts being studied (Foong & Daniel, 2010).…”
Section: Mastery Of Scientific Argumentation Between Individuals and supporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the overall mastery level of scientific argumentation for the three sub concepts was still at moderate and weak levels, regardless of the argumentative activities. These are in line with the findings by Bradley and Mosimega (1998) and Sesen and Tarhan (2010), which stated that student's performance in those concepts was less satisfactory. This may be due to their lack of scientific knowledge in the concepts being studied (Foong & Daniel, 2010).…”
Section: Mastery Of Scientific Argumentation Between Individuals and supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Following the socio-constructivist theories (Niemi, 2002), this method mainly stresses upon strategies based on social context comprising: discussions, dialogues, teamwork, peer-learning, visual based coaching, classroom writing, problem-solving, computer-based tutoring, debates, play, role-play, simulations, sports and peer-teaching, demos, questions/answer techniques, mini-lectures, cooperative learning, and collaborative learning (Sesen & Tarhan, 2010;Soltanzadeh, Hashemi, & Shahi, 2013). The students participation Sivan, Leung, Woon, and Kember (2000) is encouraged through conducive environment and an equivalent partnership among the students founded on reciprocal reverence (Drew & Mackie, 2011;Niemi, Nevgi, & Aksit, 2016).…”
Section: Active Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active learning centered on students also poses a student's critical effect on the answers raised by other students who are presentations, the students are interested in asking the unintelligible so as to prevent misunderstanding. Sesen & Tarhan (2010) also revealed "This situation demonstrates the positive effects of active learning applications based on constructivism to improve students 'learning power, preventing misunderstanding and improving students' thinking skills such as analysis, linking, synthesis, cognitive thinking analytically contrasting with conventional approaches".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%