2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promising bacterial genera for agricultural practices: An insight on plant growth-promoting properties and microbial safety aspects

Abstract: In order to address the ever-increasing problem of the world's population food needs, the optimization of farming crops yield, the combat of iron deficiency in plants (chlorosis) and the elimination/reduction of crop pathogens are of key challenges to solve. Traditional ways of solving these problems are either unpractical on a large scale (e.g. use of manure) or are not environmental friendly (e.g. application of iron-synthetic fertilizers or indiscriminate use of pesticides). Therefore, the search for greene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 248 publications
(327 reference statements)
3
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5, of the enzyme results, shows that substrate 0:100 (VC:FC) had the lowest FTA, linked to phosphate mineralisation processes, as well as the lower concentration in PCE, and that by its very nature, this substrate did not have a positive effect on PGPBs as there were no statistical differences from the control ( Table 8). The maximum average value obtained by PGPB was 292 mg L −1 for BM, followed by FA (278 mg L −1 ) and AV (267 mg L −1 ), which are also associated with inorganic phosphate solubilisation capabilities [55], while the control recorded the lowest phosphate value of 245 mg L −1 in PCE. The solubilising capacity of phosphates by BM in substrates with VC was observed, by improving the nutritional status of the plants in the analyses at 90 and 120 DAT.…”
Section: Crop Nutritional Statusmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Table 5, of the enzyme results, shows that substrate 0:100 (VC:FC) had the lowest FTA, linked to phosphate mineralisation processes, as well as the lower concentration in PCE, and that by its very nature, this substrate did not have a positive effect on PGPBs as there were no statistical differences from the control ( Table 8). The maximum average value obtained by PGPB was 292 mg L −1 for BM, followed by FA (278 mg L −1 ) and AV (267 mg L −1 ), which are also associated with inorganic phosphate solubilisation capabilities [55], while the control recorded the lowest phosphate value of 245 mg L −1 in PCE. The solubilising capacity of phosphates by BM in substrates with VC was observed, by improving the nutritional status of the plants in the analyses at 90 and 120 DAT.…”
Section: Crop Nutritional Statusmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding the potential health risk of PGPR to human, efforts in characterization of the isolates at the species level should be employed before proceeding with formulation development or pilot and largescale field level applications. Currently, agricultural microbiologists are mainly focused on the beneficial traits of the isolates while ignoring the possible existence of opportunistic human or animal pathogenicity [22,23]. Therefore, it is highly desirable to use phylogenomic data for exact taxonomy classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) is a group of rhizosphere bacteria that can enhance plant growth by phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, biological nitrogen fixation, production of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, and production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) [13]. Rhizobium is a well-known plant microbiota for nitrogen fixation traits with legume host and non-legume plant growth promoters [14][15][16]. Such as, Rhizobium leguminosarum trifolii E11 is able to promote rice plant growth by phosphate solubilization and IAA production; Bradyrhizobium japonicum can promote the growth of radishes by siderophore production [16], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%