2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promise and pitfalls in the meta-analysis of genetic association studies: a response to Sen and Schinka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Had we chosen to report exclusively on the results of the 1991 survey, we would have drawn the conclusion that a significant association between 5-HTTLPR and anxiety-related traits is present, although the effect was in the other direction than expected. Therefore, not only different phenotypes should be measured, as suggested by Munafo et al (2005b), but they should also be measured repeatedly. This also provides the opportunity to analyse mean scores over occasions, which is more powerful because of the high number of subjects and the reduction of measurement error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Had we chosen to report exclusively on the results of the 1991 survey, we would have drawn the conclusion that a significant association between 5-HTTLPR and anxiety-related traits is present, although the effect was in the other direction than expected. Therefore, not only different phenotypes should be measured, as suggested by Munafo et al (2005b), but they should also be measured repeatedly. This also provides the opportunity to analyse mean scores over occasions, which is more powerful because of the high number of subjects and the reduction of measurement error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even meta-analyses on the association between 5-HTTLPR and personality traits (Munafo et al 2003;Munafo et al 2005a;Schinka et al 2004;Sen et al 2004) or affective disorders (Lasky-Su et al 2005;Lotrich and Pollock 2004) reached conflicting conclusions. This might be partly due to methodological differences between the meta-analyses (Munafo et al 2005b;Schinka 2005;Sen et al 2005). Munafo et al (2005b), therefore, stated that ''Very large, well designed primary studies remain the most reliable way of obtaining reproducible results''.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reader is also referred to the interesting papers of Munafo et al 28,34,35 who examined the impact of publication bias (authors tend to publish only positive results -a tendency encouraged by most journals) and other methodological problems connected with meta-analysis. Munafo et al offered the sound advice that large studies, with sufficient power and employing multiple phenotype measures, is likely the best strategy towards resolving the role of DRD4 and 5-HTTLPR as well as other genes in partially determining the architecture of personality traits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the majority of these studies were underpowered, with sample sizes being small relative to what is needed to draw conclusions based on the small effect size that can be attributed to a single gene. two studies that were adequately powered (Willis-Owen et al 2005;terracciano et al 2009) did not find a correlation, however, several meta-analyses did (Schinka et al 2004;Sen et al 2004;Munafo et al 2005). the latter two investigations clarified that finding a correlation was dependent upon the method of meta-analysis being used.…”
Section: Serotonin Transporter Imaging and Post-mortem Studies Of Suimentioning
confidence: 87%