Promiscuous (use of) feminist methodologies: the dirty theory and messy practice of educational research beyond gender

Childers, Sara M.; Rhee, Jeong‐eun; Daza, Stephanie Lynn

doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.786849

Cited by 35 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This call for a different knowledge has been very well received, judging from the numbers of special issues that appeared since then (Childers et al, 2013; Koro-Ljungberg and MacLure, 2013; Koro-Ljungberg and Mazzei, 2012; Lather and St. Pierre, 2013; Lenz Taguchi and St. Pierre, 2017; St. Pierre et al, 2016; St.…”

Section: The Breeding Ground Of Affective Ethnography: Post-qualitatimentioning

confidence: 99%

Theorizing affective ethnography for organization studies

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article introduces a new label, ‘Affective Ethnography’, and grounds it within the debates on post-qualitative methodologies and affective methodologies. Affective ethnography is theorized as a style of research practice that acknowledges that all elements—texts, actors, materialities, language, agencies—are already entangled in complex ways, and that they should be read in their intra-actions, through one another, as data in motion/data that move. I discuss three pillars for affective ethnographies that relate to researchers’ presence in doing fieldwork and their bodily capacity to affect/be affected. The first is embodiment and embodied knowing. Doing fieldwork implies the ability to resonate with, becoming-with, and the capacity for affective attunement. The second aspect relates to place as flow, and process—to placeness. The third relates to affect as the power to act and therefore to the presence in the fieldwork of the capacity to ‘make do’, either intentionally or unintentionally.

show abstract

Section: The Breeding Ground Of Affective Ethnography: Post-qualitatimentioning

confidence: 99%

Theorizing affective ethnography for organization studies

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While the extent of this process was partly unanticipated, onus on a collaborative approach to generating empirical evidence and the importance of participant voice were methodologically central to our perspectives as feminist gender researchers. Our research was with men, but we drew on principles derived from feminist methodologies (see Stanley and Wise, 1993; Childers et al, 2013). We sought to actively avoid the tendency in some mainstream gender research identified by postcolonial feminists toward positioning of ‘feminist as tourist’ (Mohanty, 2003: 518), whereby the researched are not understood in relation to their everyday lives, but only in stereotypical terms.…”

Section: Researcher Reflexivity and Dramaturgical Dilemmasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performativity, border-crossings and ethics in a prison-based creative writing project

Hinton-Smith

Seal

2018

Qualitative Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We critically reflect on insights from our experiences as female researchers on a creative writing project in a men’s prison, including the emotional impact on the men involved and the ways in which our role as participant researchers impacted deeply on us. Juxtaposed starkly with the physical constraints of the prison, a sense of journeys emerged as significant throughout the study, particularly the symbolic crossing of boundaries. We draw on theories of performativity from both Feminist and Symbolic Interactionist perspectives to frame our understanding of the experience of being participant researchers in prison creative writing workshops, and also consider associated ethical issues.

show abstract

“…Electroacoustic data analysis and DAT (sonification), for examples, are not simply tools to collect or feel/hear/see data, but aesthetic processes of inquiry for onto-epistemological performativity that exploits the high versatility of quantification (e.g., values coded as binary numbers) in qualitatively affective ways (Craig & Daza, 2014;Daza, 2014a;2014b;Daza & Huckaby, 2014;Daza et al, 2015). This takes seriously that method/ologies are agentic processes, more like storytelling (Daza, 2013d) and always already "on the move" (Childers, 2012;Childers, Rhee, & Daza, 2013;Daza & Childers, submitted).…”

Section: Examples Of Steph's Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond Ocular Inquiry

Daza

Gershon

2015

Qualitative Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To celebrate the 20th anniversary of Qualitative Inquiry (QI), we write about the ongoing hegemony of the ocular in research and toward a more multisensory, and aural, embodied inquiry. Sonic inquiry is attention and intention as meta/physical and socially embodied processes without ignoring the body or separating the mind from body or material-physical and social worlds. This article is about acknowledging that sounds and silences have always shaped (research/er) possibilities, as well as what hearing research futures might offer.

show abstract

Promiscuous (use of) feminist methodologies: the dirty theory and messy practice of educational research beyond gender

Cited by 35 publications

References 40 publications

Theorizing affective ethnography for organization studies

Theorizing affective ethnography for organization studies

Performativity, border-crossings and ethics in a prison-based creative writing project

Beyond Ocular Inquiry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About