Promethee: As a supporting decision of selection of poor rice receivers

Maulachela, Adam Bachtiar; Hidayat, Syahroni; Fitriani, Nurullia; Rizal, Ahmad Ashril; Budiarto, J.; Anas, Andi Sofyan; Nugraha, Gibran Satya; Juliansyah, Andi Awal; Qudsi, J.; Abdurahim,; Yunus, Muhammad; Sriwinarti, N. K.

doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1211/1/012033

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Multi-criteria Evaluation Of Implementing Logistics Automati1

A General Workflow By Evaluating Variants Of Aslp Implementa1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2019

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Other1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Spearman's rank correlation coefficient or to use a method of evaluation which accepts qualitative measures, e.g. the PROMETHE; AHP [6,7].…”

Section: Multi-criteria Evaluation Of Implementing Logistics Automatimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of the effectiveness of implementing production logistics automation systems supported by computer simulation tools

Więcek

Kuric

et al. 2019

MATEC Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, authors described selected logistics automation tools (ASLP) and briefly presented the PROMETHEE multi-criteria decision making method in terms of its application in assessing the implementation of ASLP in the field of production logistics. A methodology for preparing the data required to evaluate the ASLP implementation process based on modelling and simulation tools was also proposed.

show abstract

“…Spearman's rank correlation coefficient or to use a method of evaluation which accepts qualitative measures, e.g. the PROMETHE; AHP [6,7].…”

Section: Multi-criteria Evaluation Of Implementing Logistics Automatimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In such a case, modelling and simulation tools should be used, which allow to estimate the necessary values. (2) w (3) w (4) w (5) w (6) w (7) Generalized criterion P (1) P (2) P (3) P (4) P (5) P (6) P (7) Indifference threshold…”

Section: A General Workflow By Evaluating Variants Of Aslp Implementamentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the effectiveness of implementing production logistics automation systems supported by computer simulation tools

Więcek

Kuric

et al. 2019

MATEC Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparative Analysis of the Implementation of the AHP and AHP-PROMETHEE for the Selection of Training Participants

Istiqomah¹,

Windarni

2019

2019 4th International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Promethee: As a supporting decision of selection of poor rice receivers

Cited by 2 publications

References 10 publications

Evaluation of the effectiveness of implementing production logistics automation systems supported by computer simulation tools

Evaluation of the effectiveness of implementing production logistics automation systems supported by computer simulation tools

Comparative Analysis of the Implementation of the AHP and AHP-PROMETHEE for the Selection of Training Participants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About