2017
DOI: 10.5817/sp2017-3-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proměny bariér ke vzdělávání dospělých v České republice: 2005–2015

Abstract: Abstrakt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
11

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on data from the PIAAC survey of Czech skill formation from 2011 to 2012, Saar and Räis (2017, p. 545) conclude that there has been a shift in the prevailing opinion that the local labor force has no need of training. We assume that the increase in educational activities would not have been possible without the investment of companies in job-related training as compared to 2011 (see Table 4), as most low-skilled workers declared financial reasons as the main constraint of their lifelong learning activities (Kalenda & Kočvarová, 2017) in addition to the uselessness of NFE for their jobs (Simonová & Hamplová, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on data from the PIAAC survey of Czech skill formation from 2011 to 2012, Saar and Räis (2017, p. 545) conclude that there has been a shift in the prevailing opinion that the local labor force has no need of training. We assume that the increase in educational activities would not have been possible without the investment of companies in job-related training as compared to 2011 (see Table 4), as most low-skilled workers declared financial reasons as the main constraint of their lifelong learning activities (Kalenda & Kočvarová, 2017) in addition to the uselessness of NFE for their jobs (Simonová & Hamplová, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Analýzy účasti dospělých v NVD a překážek, které jedincům v zapojení brání [Czesaná, 2010;Kalenda, 2015bKalenda, , 2015cKalenda, , 2016Kalenda & Kočvarová, 2017Říhová & Czesaná, 2013;Vaculíková, et al, 2020]. Daný typ výzkumů po roce 2010 významně přispěl k hlubšímu porozumění hlavním percipovaným bariérám v účasti na NVD, včetně některých specifik, která jsou pro Českou republiku příznačná.…”
Section: Dosavadní Stav Poznání V čEské Republiceunclassified
“…Pak se ale tento segment NVD výrazně zmenšil a jeho finanční efektivita klesla. V souvislosti s tím někteří badatelé upozorňují na nezamýšlené vedlejší efekty této podpory, která ústí ve snižování percepce utility a kvality tohoto typu vzdělávání [Janoušková et al, 2008;Kopecký & Šerák, 2015;Kalenda, 2015b;Kalenda & Kočvarová, 2019;Palán, 2013] a následně v růst bariér na cestě k dalšímu vzdělávání [Kalenda & Kočvarová, 2017].…”
Section: Vývoj účAsti Na Nvd a Režim Sociálního Státuunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Czech Republic, the impact of previous NFE experience on adult participation in continuing education has been mentioned by a number of previous surveys (Kalenda, 2015a(Kalenda, , 2015bRabušicová & Rabušic, 2008). The mechanism of its effect is based on the fact that experience with NFE reduces two types of highly frequented barriers to participation in NFE in the Czech Republic (Kalenda, 2016;Kalenda & Kočvarová, 2017). It is partly the weakening of the so-called personality barriers connected with the conviction of individuals that they would not manage further education, either due to lack of skills, education, age or other reasons, and partly it is information barriers.…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%