1988
DOI: 10.1248/cpb.36.1456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolyl endopeptidase from bovine testis: Purification, characterization and comparison with the enzymes from other tissues.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The molecular weight of the native enzyme was 74,000 as determined by gel filtration on Sephadex G-150, indicating that the enzyme is a monomer with a molecular weight of around 75,000. This value corresponds to the 68,000 to 77,000 previously determined for proline-specific enzymes from plants (21,37,38), mammalian tissues (10,20,23,36), and Flavobactenum meningosepticum (32,40). The isoelectric point was 6.2, as compared with 9.6 for the Flavobactenium enzyme (32).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The molecular weight of the native enzyme was 74,000 as determined by gel filtration on Sephadex G-150, indicating that the enzyme is a monomer with a molecular weight of around 75,000. This value corresponds to the 68,000 to 77,000 previously determined for proline-specific enzymes from plants (21,37,38), mammalian tissues (10,20,23,36), and Flavobactenum meningosepticum (32,40). The isoelectric point was 6.2, as compared with 9.6 for the Flavobactenium enzyme (32).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…PPSE was inhibited by diisopropylfluorophosphate, like other proline-specific endopeptidases (10,20,21,23,30,(34)(35)(36)(37)40), and it may therefore be classified as a serine protease. The activity of PPSE appears not to be dependent on thiol groups, since it was not sensitive to mercuric ions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S-17092-1 was kindly given by Prof. F. Checler. [36] Experiments with ZGP-pNA: POP activity was determined by the method described by Yoshimoto et al [37] Briefly, the reactions were performed in micro titer plates of 96 wells, which allowed the simultaneous monitoring of multiple reactions. For each reaction, activity buffer (131 mL,100 mm of Na/K phosphate buffer, pH 8.0) was pre-incubated for 15 min at 30 8C with hPOP (7 nm) and with the corresponding inhibitor solution (6 mL) or activity buffer (controls).…”
Section: Pop Activity Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First isolated in the human uterus as an oxytocin-degrading enzyme (Walter et al, 1971), PEP was subsequently purified from lamb kidney (Koida and Walter, 1976), and the PEP cDNAs have been cloned in human (Vanhoof et al, 1994), mouse (Ishino et al, 1998), and rat (Kimura and Takahashi, 2000). PEP is widely distributed in mammalian tissues, including muscle (Daly et al, 1985), liver (Yamakawa et al, 1986), testis (Yoshimoto et al, 1988), and brain (Kato et al, 1980;Kalwant and Porter, 1991). A crystal structure analysis of PEP has revealed that the catalytic site is covered by an unclosed seven-bladed ␤-propeller domain that is thought to exclude peptides longer than 30 amino acids and a fortiori proteins from proteolysis (Fü löp et al, 1998(Fü löp et al, , 2000.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%