2015
DOI: 10.18801/jbar.050115.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolonging vase life of cut rose (Rosa hybrida L. cv. Red Pearl) through chemical preservatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, plenty of cut flower preservatives have been tested, which are effective but toxic and costly in large-scale applications [ 31 ]. Furthermore, little research has focused on the form and rate of Si used in spite of some of the positive aspects of Si applications that have been reported in ornamental species [ 32 , 33 ]. For instance, bulk attempts that have been too large in size have been conducted by supplementing chemical silicon for postharvest plants, resulting in a shortage of reports regarding silicon use during the pre-harvest process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, plenty of cut flower preservatives have been tested, which are effective but toxic and costly in large-scale applications [ 31 ]. Furthermore, little research has focused on the form and rate of Si used in spite of some of the positive aspects of Si applications that have been reported in ornamental species [ 32 , 33 ]. For instance, bulk attempts that have been too large in size have been conducted by supplementing chemical silicon for postharvest plants, resulting in a shortage of reports regarding silicon use during the pre-harvest process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum vase life was found from T7 (9.7 days) which was statistically identical with T6 (9.3. days); followed by T5 and T9 (8.7 days) while minimum from T0 (7.3 days) which was statistically similar with T1, T2 and T3 (7.7 days) (Table 01). Salicylic acid and citric acid along with sugar increases the vase life of rose (Khan et al, 2015). SA has a pH of 2.4 and the acidic solution inhibits bacteria growth and proliferation (Raskin, 1992 production (Srivastava, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultivar differences for vase life have been reported in gerbera (Ferrante et al, 2007;Nazari deljou et al, 2011;Emongor, 2004) and roses (Ichimura et al, 2002). Increase of flower vase life was found by the application of different floral preservatives in gerbera (Pavana et al, 2015a) rose (Pavana et al, 2015b), orchid (Pavana et al, 2015c), tuberose (Jamal Uddin et al, 2015), gladiolus (Mehraj et al, 2013a) and chrysanthemum (Mehraj et al, 2013b). Water stress is a function of water content at harvest and rates of water uptake and water loss after harvest (Halvey and Mayak, 1979;Meman et al, 2006;Zamani et al, 2011).…”
Section: Vase Lifementioning
confidence: 99%