2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolonging pulse duration in ultrasound-mediated gene delivery lowers acoustic pressure threshold for efficient gene transfer to cells and small animals

Abstract: While ultrasound-mediated gene delivery (UMGD) has been accomplished using high peak negative pressures (PNPs) of 2 MPa or above, emerging research showed that this may not be a requirement for microbubble (MB) cavitation. Thus, we investigated lower-pressure conditions close to the MB inertial cavitation threshold and focused towards further increasing gene transfer efficiency and reducing associated cell damage. We created a matrix of 21 conditions (n = 3/cond.) to test in HEK293T cells using pulse durations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we combined a much longer pulse duration of 200 µs with a conservative PRF of 200 Hz (compared to a pulse duration of 30 µs with a PRF of 100 Hz in vitro) for a mouse model, based on the rationale of the presence of greater attenuation and the lack of immediate MB-cell contact. This approach is similar to that used previously in a study addressing gene delivery in mice [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, we combined a much longer pulse duration of 200 µs with a conservative PRF of 200 Hz (compared to a pulse duration of 30 µs with a PRF of 100 Hz in vitro) for a mouse model, based on the rationale of the presence of greater attenuation and the lack of immediate MB-cell contact. This approach is similar to that used previously in a study addressing gene delivery in mice [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although some investigations have claimed that vascular disruption played a role during high-dose irradiation, the actual contributions from endothelial cells to the tumor response to radiation remain controversial [42,43]. Besides, a PRF as high as 3 kHz is not usual in research on ultrasound-guided drug delivery involving animal models [44][45][46][47], in which PRFs ranging from 1 to 100 Hz have been reported most frequently. In the present study, we combined a much longer pulse duration of 200 µs with a conservative PRF of 200 Hz (compared to a pulse duration of 30 µs with a PRF of 100 Hz in vitro) for a mouse model, based on the rationale of the presence of greater attenuation and the lack of immediate MB-cell contact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 In addition, our lab has recently demonstrated that prolonging the pulse duration can decrease the pressure threshold required for efficient gene transfer, which can further decrease the potential tissue damage. 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recent studies achieved significant gene delivery enhancement in the liver using UMGD via a laparotomic procedure in small- and large-animal models 8, 20, 21, 22. Furthermore, we improved gene transfection efficiency using novel US transducer designs and beam patterns, as well as US treatment safety by modifying US protocols using longer pulse durations and lower PNPs 9 . In order to translate our recent findings into a clinically relevant minimally invasive approach, we developed an interventional radiological procedure to facilitate transcutaneous UMGD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ultrasound (US)-mediated gene delivery (UMGD) has emerged as an effective gene transfer approach with great clinical relevancy and translational potential to treat various diseases 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. The technique has been applied to deliver genes and therapeutic agents to liver7, 8, 9 and various other tissues that are notoriously difficult to access, such as brain,10, 11, 12, 13 bone,14, 15 myocardium, 16 skeletal muscle,17, 18 and salivary glands 19 . Other gene delivery methods such as DNA-packaged nanoparticle delivery face the challenge of crossing the nuclear envelope for DNA transcription.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%