2018
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17020235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolonged Postconcussive Symptoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(110 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both of those exclusion criteria have been shown to represent potential risk factors for prolonged recovery. 50 A longstanding debate exists in the TBI literature on whether brain injury results in greater deficits (early vulnerability) or better recovery (early plasticity) as a function of ageat-injury. 51 Although chronological age accounted for significant decreases/increases in both ReHo and fALFF across several cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar regions, no significant ageat-injury interactions were observed with either ReHo or fALFF data in relationship to diagnostic status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both of those exclusion criteria have been shown to represent potential risk factors for prolonged recovery. 50 A longstanding debate exists in the TBI literature on whether brain injury results in greater deficits (early vulnerability) or better recovery (early plasticity) as a function of ageat-injury. 51 Although chronological age accounted for significant decreases/increases in both ReHo and fALFF across several cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar regions, no significant ageat-injury interactions were observed with either ReHo or fALFF data in relationship to diagnostic status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects qualified for enrollment in the study if they met the following inclusion criteria: (1) age 18-59; (2) have suffered a mild or moderate TBI ["mild" defined as having had loss of consciousness (LOC) <30 min, received a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of between 13 and 15 upon ED evaluation (if available), and experienced <24 h of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA); moderate defined as LOC between 30 min and 24 h, GCS between 9 and 12, and PTA between 24 h and 7 days]; (3) were injured between 3 months and 15 years ago; (4) report at least 1 out of 4 cognitive symptoms on the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI). Potential participants were excluded from participation in this study for: (1) a history of other neurological disease, seizures, or psychosis; (2) history of recent (within 2 years) substance/alcohol dependence; (3) any discontinuity in skull electrical conductivity; (4) any implanted electrical device (e.g., pacemaker); (5) medical admission or hospital visit within the last 3 weeks; (6) change in any psychotropic medications in the previous 2 months; (7) inability to complete the protocol; (8) appointment of a legal representative, as assessed via direct inquiry of the subject or a designated trusted other; (10) inability to provide informed consent; (11) pregnancy, current incarceration, or limited English proficiency.…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically these were thought to be due to poor coping with stress, or malingering (4,5). However, advanced imaging has contributed significantly to our current understanding of the acute and chronic sequelae of mTBI, and expanded the possible etiologies of PPS to not only include psychological phenomena but also neurological factors (6)(7)(8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended is widely used internationally for studying outcome after mTBI, and for the development of prediction models (Nelson et al, ; van der Naalt et al, ). Other outcome measures such as (persistent) posttraumatic symptoms have proven less reliable, because patients with symptoms may still resume their daily activities, symptoms are only partly specific for mTBI, and definitions of persistent symptoms vary (de Koning et al, ; Quinn, Mayer, Master, & Fann, ; Voormolen et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%