The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolonged infusion versus intermittent boluses of β-lactam antibiotics for treatment of acute infections: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical benefits of the continuous infusion strategy are supported by the results of recent meta-analyses, especially for patients with a high sickness severity and infected by less-susceptible pathogens, such as nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (11)(12)(13). In our cohort, the infective organism was not identified for 19 of the 53 patients (35.8%).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…The clinical benefits of the continuous infusion strategy are supported by the results of recent meta-analyses, especially for patients with a high sickness severity and infected by less-susceptible pathogens, such as nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (11)(12)(13). In our cohort, the infective organism was not identified for 19 of the 53 patients (35.8%).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…For example, Benko et al (7) time during which the serum concentration of ceftazidime remained above the threshold of 20 mg/liter (TϾ20 mg). Several other authors have reported similar findings (9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Contrary to the observations of Benko et al (7), the median AUC over 48 h did not differ significantly between modes of administration in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Although quite a few of these have been conducted over time, they differ markedly in their inclusion/exclusion criteria, thus not necessarily allowing elucidation of the true effectiveness of nontraditional beta-lactam dosing regimens (4,18,(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93)(94)(95)(96)(97)(98)(99)(100)(101)(102). Recent metaanalyses that focused on beta-lactams (Table 3) have mostly concluded that existing data were favorable for the use of specific or all beta-lactam agents by prolonged or continuous infusion in terms of clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Contemporary Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%