2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9452(03)00301-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proline accumulation and Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase gene properties in three rice cultivars differing in salinity and drought tolerance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth characters, including SH, RL, LA, FW and DW, of rice grown under iso-osmotic water deficit and salt stress were reduced, related to the osmotic pressure in the culture media. This was especially the case under salt-induced osmotic stress and is similar to previous reports on the reduction of growth in rice exposed to iso-osmotic stress (Bahaji et al, 2002;Hien et al, 2003;Ahmad et al, 2007). In addition, fresh weight and dry weight in tolerant cultivars, including Basmati-370 and DR2, were maintained better than in the sensitive genotypes, Basmati-Kashmir and Cuom, when subjected to iso-osmotic stress derived from mannitol/PEG (polyethylene glycol) and NaCl salt (Hien et al, 2003;Ahmad et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Growth characters, including SH, RL, LA, FW and DW, of rice grown under iso-osmotic water deficit and salt stress were reduced, related to the osmotic pressure in the culture media. This was especially the case under salt-induced osmotic stress and is similar to previous reports on the reduction of growth in rice exposed to iso-osmotic stress (Bahaji et al, 2002;Hien et al, 2003;Ahmad et al, 2007). In addition, fresh weight and dry weight in tolerant cultivars, including Basmati-370 and DR2, were maintained better than in the sensitive genotypes, Basmati-Kashmir and Cuom, when subjected to iso-osmotic stress derived from mannitol/PEG (polyethylene glycol) and NaCl salt (Hien et al, 2003;Ahmad et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…El aumento de la concentración de prolina en el tejido apical radical debido a la reducción de agua ha sido observado en especies cultivadas, como Phaseolus vulgaris, Zea mays (Sánchez-Urdaneta et al, 2003, 2005 y Oryza sativa (Hien et al, 2003), pero también en plántulas de Agave salmiana (Peña-Valdivia y Sánchez-Urdaneta, 2009). Es probable que el aumento de prolina registrado en algunas especies de Agave indique también una función de regulación osmótica (Hare y Cress, 1997), la cual se manifestó en mayor crecimiento de la raíz respecto al vástago en A. angustifolia subsp.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…For example, proline content in PT1 and IR20 (water deficit sensitive) peaked in plants subjected to severe water deficit (7 % SWC) and was higher than in the tolerant cultivars (KDML105 and NSG19) (Cha-um et al, 2010). Similarly, proline in the leaf tissues of drought sensitive, CR203 (3.12 times) is accumulated higher than in drought tolerant cultivars, DR2 (1.41 times) and Cuom (2.06 times), when plants are subjected to water deficit stress (Hien et al, 2003). In contrast, P5CR and P5CS genes in proline biosynthesis in drought tolerant (Ca/H680) are up-regulated resulting in enriched proline contents greater than those in drought sensitive (Ca/H148) when exposed to drought stress (Parida et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%