2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proliferation of Cells with Severe Nuclear Deformation on a Micropillar Array

Abstract: Cellular responses on a topographic surface are fundamental topics about interfaces and biology. Herein, a poly­(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) micropillar array was prepared and found to trigger significant self-deformation of cell nuclei. The time-dependent cell viability and thus cell proliferation was investigated. Despite significant nuclear deformation, all of the examined cell types (Hela, HepG2, MC3T3-E1, and NIH3T3) could survive and proliferate on the micropillar array yet exhibited different prolifera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7b) leading to an important reduction of the distance between the nuclear lamina and the micropillar boundary. Additionally, the nucleus starts acquiring a 'peanut' shape as it has been experimentally observed for different cellular phenotypes including mesenchymal stem cells, osteosarcoma cells and bone marrow stroma cells [11][12][13][14]. Such an outcome becomes even more evident when the nuclear lamina is ablated (S 3 ) (Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7b) leading to an important reduction of the distance between the nuclear lamina and the micropillar boundary. Additionally, the nucleus starts acquiring a 'peanut' shape as it has been experimentally observed for different cellular phenotypes including mesenchymal stem cells, osteosarcoma cells and bone marrow stroma cells [11][12][13][14]. Such an outcome becomes even more evident when the nuclear lamina is ablated (S 3 ) (Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…To do so, patterned microfluidic devices have been employed during the last few years in order to characterize the cell mechanical behaviour [8,9] and the nucleus self-deformations [10][11][12][13] and shape changes [14,15] induced by mechanical forces, which are due to the interaction between the cell and the topological surface. Assays on micropillared substrates involve successive steps: (i) contact between the cell and the pillars, (ii) adhesion of the cell on the pillars surface, (iii) cell spreading, (iv) cell polarization and (v) cell crawling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, according to the experimental data presented in Erk et al (2010) and Storm et al (2005), the Young modulus of the actin fibres exponentially increases as a function of the strain. If this was the case here, the raising of the stiffening phenomenon would inhibit the cell penetration in between the pillars and we would not obtain the nucleus self-deformation as it has been experimentally observed (Morgan et al 2007;Geiger et al 2009;Liu et al 2017Liu et al , 2018. Thus, as explained in Sect.…”
Section: Nucleus and Cytoplasm Deformation On Micropillared Substratementioning
confidence: 75%
“…Micropillars are most commonly employed as an array of thin beams in traction force microscopy to access the interaction forces between a cell and its substrate (Tan et al 2003;du Roure et al 2005;Ghibaudo et al 2011). Additionally, by controlling the material used, the size of the pillars and the gap size between pillars, they can serve to control the shape of the nucleus (Pan et al 2012;Hanson et al 2015) and investigate the process of nuclear self-deformation induced by mechanical forces generated by the topological surface (Davidson et al 2010;Badique et al 2013;Liu et al 2017Liu et al , 2018. These recent experiments offer a new insight on nuclear deformation and raise further questions: is gravity driving this movement (Pan et al 2012)?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation