1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(19971215)37:4<508::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proliferation and differentiation of human trabecular osteoblastic cells on hydroxyapatite

Abstract: In order to evaluate whether human osteoblastic cells differentiate normally on hydroxyapatite, we have compared the adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of human trabecular (HT) osteoblastic cells on synthetic-dense hydroxyapatite and on standard plastic culture. We show here that initial HT cell attachment was 4-fold lower on hydroxyapatite than on plastic after 4 h of culture, and that normal cell attachment on hydroxyapatite was restored after 18 h of culture. HT cell proliferation was similar on t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
1
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
62
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This theory is in agreement with classical osteogenesis timelines and behaviours as shown by Stein and Lian [31]. Our results are also in support of various studies that the presence of HA can cause bone cells to differentiate and even to start to deposit mineral [32,33,34]. The presence of the HA should have a further advantage, PLA degradation products are acidic and therefore have been known to cause an adverse biological response.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This theory is in agreement with classical osteogenesis timelines and behaviours as shown by Stein and Lian [31]. Our results are also in support of various studies that the presence of HA can cause bone cells to differentiate and even to start to deposit mineral [32,33,34]. The presence of the HA should have a further advantage, PLA degradation products are acidic and therefore have been known to cause an adverse biological response.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These were based on the utilization of supports, as gels and sponges of collagen type I, PLGA foam, DegraPol, agarose, Matrigel, or methylcellulose. 7,10,15,16,18,20,22,25,26,30,32,34,37,39 Normal human osteogenic cells, osteoblasts from prepubertal-age donors, or bone marrow stromal fibroblasts adhering to scaffolding of HAP/ TC, 16,20,25,26,30,34 collagraft, 26 collagen sponges, 15,39 or bone chips 5 were utilized to produce specifically 3D structures designed for direct implantation in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also well understood that the new bone integration on an orthopedic surface is closely related and governed by bone cell (osteoblast) attachment, proliferation and differentiation, which predicts the mineralization of apatite on it [133]. Thus, the behavior of osteoblast is also very important to determine biocompatibility of orthopedic surface along with the apatite formability.…”
Section: Osteoblast/fibroblast Proliferation and Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because a smaller amount of lateral force is required to push the detached cell along the scratched path/direction. Cell adhesion force is obtained by subtracting the lateral force contribution of the bare scratch from the height of the lateral force hump as explained in Moreover, a single osteoblast was found to synthesize more ECM with type I collagen and osteonectin on HA than on plastic [133][134], which may increase the attachment of the cell with the HA substrate. All these reports, along with the quantitative evaluation of adhesion force and energy presented in the present study, confirms that attachment of a single osteoblast is better on HA based surfaces than plastic.…”
Section: Adhesion Quantification Techniques For a Single Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%