2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prokaryotic sulfur oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

14
397
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(411 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
14
397
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of bacterial species with closest affiliation to Fe-oxidizer bacteria (Acidithiobacillus spp.) indicates that the microbial oxidation of Fe(II) is a significant biogeochemical process in the sediments of AML 2 as noted in previous studies (e.g., Friedrich et al 2005;Rohwerder and Sand 2007;Ghosh and Dam 2009;Schippers et al 2010;Dopson and Johnson 2012;Chen et al 2013). Insignificant variations in pH, along with observed changes in DO and Fe concentration throughout the water column until a depth of 6 m, also suggest co-occurrences of Fe(II) oxidation and precipitation of Fe(III) minerals buffering pH as reported in various AMLs with pH ranging from 2.59 to 3.79 (Kusel 2003;Peiffer et al 2013;Vithana et al 2015).…”
Section: Geochemical and Biogeochemical Processes In The Water Columnsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The presence of bacterial species with closest affiliation to Fe-oxidizer bacteria (Acidithiobacillus spp.) indicates that the microbial oxidation of Fe(II) is a significant biogeochemical process in the sediments of AML 2 as noted in previous studies (e.g., Friedrich et al 2005;Rohwerder and Sand 2007;Ghosh and Dam 2009;Schippers et al 2010;Dopson and Johnson 2012;Chen et al 2013). Insignificant variations in pH, along with observed changes in DO and Fe concentration throughout the water column until a depth of 6 m, also suggest co-occurrences of Fe(II) oxidation and precipitation of Fe(III) minerals buffering pH as reported in various AMLs with pH ranging from 2.59 to 3.79 (Kusel 2003;Peiffer et al 2013;Vithana et al 2015).…”
Section: Geochemical and Biogeochemical Processes In The Water Columnsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…When extrapolating these results to the full community composition per well, a range of putative chemolithoautotrophic communities are prevalent from saline wells, including Halothiobacillaceae (Chromatiales) that aerobically oxidize reduced sulfur compounds (Kelly and Wood, 2000), uncultured Epsilonproteobacteria and Hydrogenophilales (Thiobacillus spp.). Thiobacilli are perhaps the beststudied sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (Friedrich et al, 2005). In contrast, potential heterotrophic and chemoorganotrophic indicator taxa in freshwater wells correlated to dissolved oxygen and included the Caulobacterales, which are aerobic, oligotrophic aquatic bacteria with a high degree of metabolic versatility (Boone et al, 2001), Sphingomonadales, which have wide metabolic capabilities (Frederickson et al, 1995), and Rhizobiales, which are ecologically diverse, important in biofilm formation under oxic and anoxic conditions, and are even capable of oxidizing reduced sulfur (Masuda et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dsr operon is used by sulfate/sulfitereducing microbes in anoxic environments, as well as sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in oxic and anoxic environments (Fig. 3A) 30,31 . DsrC, specifically, dictates sulfur metabolism rates, as it provides the sulfur substrate to DsrAB-sulfite reductase for processing 32 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, 4 soxYZ genes from the sox operon were identified on viral contigs (Extended Data Fig. 6) 30,31 . Like DsrC, SoxYZ is an important sulfur carrier protein harboring a sulfur interaction motif identified in GOV SoxYZ proteins (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%