2009
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6150-4-34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things

Abstract: Background: The concept of a tree of life is prevalent in the evolutionary literature. It stems from attempting to obtain a grand unified natural system that reflects a recurrent process of species and lineage splittings for all forms of life. Traditionally, the discipline of systematics operates in a similar hierarchy of bifurcating (sometimes multifurcating) categories. The assumption of a universal tree of life hinges upon the process of evolution being tree-like throughout all forms of life and all of biol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
171
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
2
171
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…An entry in the literature of this debate is in [11]. In recent years the opposition between the two approaches has been overstepped by more unitary experimental and theoretical frames, taking into account energetic, evolutionary, proto-metabolic and ur-environmental aspects [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The productive interaction between vesicles and RNA replication was reported [23].…”
Section: The Need For a Unitary Physical-chemical Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An entry in the literature of this debate is in [11]. In recent years the opposition between the two approaches has been overstepped by more unitary experimental and theoretical frames, taking into account energetic, evolutionary, proto-metabolic and ur-environmental aspects [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The productive interaction between vesicles and RNA replication was reported [23].…”
Section: The Need For a Unitary Physical-chemical Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Horizontal flows can be facilitated by plasmids [4], phage [5], viruses [6], transposons [7], gene transfer agents [8], intercellular nanotubes [9], or simply the hybridization of sexual species, followed by re-integration of the hybrid into one of the ancestral species [10,11]. Contemporary genomes are, and extinct genomes were, complex mixtures of genetic mergers [12,13], with the horizontal gene flows being as normal as vertical gene flows. This presents us with a problem if we are restricted to using tree-like processes that only depict vertical gene flows to model the data, as we would not be able to model and understand the impact of horizontal gene flows in evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods include: SSNs, anchored sequence alignments and N-rooted graphs. Although conventional phylogenetic trees might be appropriate for visualising the evolution of many genes, they are not suitable for all evolutionary events [38][39][40][41] and are specifically unable to display evolutionary histories when these histories are entangled because of merging. In other words, when two evolving entities merge to form a single sequence, the histories of all the sequences cannot be represented by traditional phylogenetic trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%