2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01730.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prokaryotic diversity in continuous cropping and rotational cropping soybean soil

Abstract: In spite of the techniques based on the amplification of 16S rRNA genes (16S rDNA) to compare bacterial communities that are now widely in use in microbial ecology, little is known about the composition of the soybean continuous cropping (CC) and rotational cropping (RC) soil microbial community. To address this, we compared the levels of bacterial community diversity in RC and 5-year CC rhizosphere soil samples. We selected 407 clones in RC and 490 clones in CC for restriction fragment length polymorphism ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In soils sampled in the same plots in 2005, soil microbial diversity measured by the phospholipid fatty acid method was also greater in the W‐P rotation than in the P‐P monoculture (Nayyar et al, 2009). Similar results have been reported, using different methods of measuring microbial diversity in soybean in China (Tang et al, 2009, Li et al, 2010) and Argentina (Vargas Gil et al, 2011), cotton in the southern United States (Acosta‐Martinez et al, 2010), and sugarcane in Australia (Pankhurst et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In soils sampled in the same plots in 2005, soil microbial diversity measured by the phospholipid fatty acid method was also greater in the W‐P rotation than in the P‐P monoculture (Nayyar et al, 2009). Similar results have been reported, using different methods of measuring microbial diversity in soybean in China (Tang et al, 2009, Li et al, 2010) and Argentina (Vargas Gil et al, 2011), cotton in the southern United States (Acosta‐Martinez et al, 2010), and sugarcane in Australia (Pankhurst et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A decline in the bacteria/fungi ratio was observed in ‘sick’ soils from continuous mono-cropping systems [26]. p -Coumaric acid increased the relative abundances of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria and decreased the relative abundance of Cyanobacteria , which was also found in soils under mono-cropped soybean [60]. The increase in the population of soil-borne pathogens (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Using culture‐dependent methods, several studies have demonstrated that CC of soybean changes the soil microbial composition compared with rotation cropping of soybean (Chen, Yin, Wang, & Zou, ; Liu, Zhou, & Han, ; Xu et al, ; Yu, Wu, Wang, Chen, & Gu, ). Subsequently, with the development of DNA‐based molecular techniques, a few studies have shown that the rhizospheric microbial communities were different between continuous and rotation cropping of soybean (Cui, Wang, Han, & Cai, ; Li et al, ; Tang et al, ). Similar to previously reported results for bacterial communities (Liu et al, ), a clear and significant difference in soil fungal community composition was detected in this study between the two soybean cropping systems in both bulk and rhizospheric soils (Figure a; Table S6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%