2017
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2017.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prokaryote genome fluidity is dependent on effective population size

Abstract: Many prokaryote species are known to have fluid genomes, with different strains varying markedly in accessory gene content through the combined action of gene loss, gene gain via lateral transfer, as well as gene duplication. However, the evolutionary forces determining genome fluidity are not yet well understood. We here for the first time systematically analyse the degree to which this distinctive genomic feature differs between bacterial species. We find that genome fluidity is positively correlated with sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
85
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it has long been thought that a large pool of accessory genes would be beneficial in certain habitats (and habitat combinations), but the role of the pan-genome as an adaptive evolutionary entity has been recently disputed. In the respective debate [8,[61][62][63][64][65][66], analyses of pan-genome size estimates ( Fig. 2b) have led to the conclusion that pan-genomes are adaptive [8], while studies focusing on diversity measures such as genome fluidity led to the conclusion that pan-genome evolution is predominantly neutral [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it has long been thought that a large pool of accessory genes would be beneficial in certain habitats (and habitat combinations), but the role of the pan-genome as an adaptive evolutionary entity has been recently disputed. In the respective debate [8,[61][62][63][64][65][66], analyses of pan-genome size estimates ( Fig. 2b) have led to the conclusion that pan-genomes are adaptive [8], while studies focusing on diversity measures such as genome fluidity led to the conclusion that pan-genome evolution is predominantly neutral [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the respective debate [8,[61][62][63][64][65][66], analyses of pan-genome size estimates ( Fig. 2b) have led to the conclusion that pan-genomes are adaptive [8], while studies focusing on diversity measures such as genome fluidity led to the conclusion that pan-genome evolution is predominantly neutral [61]. Our analysis shows that environmental conditions and phylogenetic inertia affect size-related pan-genome features to a higher degree (than diversity features), suggesting that the adaptiveness of pan-genomes is at least partially explained by environmental preferences of species and their phylogenetic inertia (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since we observed similar high levels of recombination within the Mesotoga W and A lineages, additional forces must be responsible for the larger proportion of variable accessory genes. Perhaps more cryptic niches are available in low-versus hightemperature subsurface environments (McInerney et al, 2017), or Mesotoga may have larger effective population sizes than the hyperthermophiles (Andreani et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The balance between selection and drift plays important roles in shaping bacterial genomes and are often studied by estimating the selection coefficient and the effective population size ( N e ) [18, 19]. Due to several technical and biological reasons (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%