2005
DOI: 10.1080/09535310500034119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projection of input–output tables by means of mathematical programming based on the hypothesis of stable structural evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RAS method is connected to the second group as it is is an algorithm to solve the updating problem using a particular entropy measure (McDougall ). Some results related to the first group of measures can be found in Matuszewski et al (), Harrigan and Buchanan (), Canning and Wang () and Tarancón and Del Río (). Works about updating criteria based on entropy measures are Macgill (, ), Golan et al () and Robinson et al (), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The RAS method is connected to the second group as it is is an algorithm to solve the updating problem using a particular entropy measure (McDougall ). Some results related to the first group of measures can be found in Matuszewski et al (), Harrigan and Buchanan (), Canning and Wang () and Tarancón and Del Río (). Works about updating criteria based on entropy measures are Macgill (, ), Golan et al () and Robinson et al (), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In order to circumvent the restrictions imposed by incomplete and misaligned initial estimate data whilst at the same time ensuring smooth (that is hysteresis-free) inter-year transitions, Tarancon and Del Rio (2005) apply the stable structural evolution hypothesis, and use adjacent-year values in order to formulate bounds as constraints for unknown inputoutput coefficients, which stay active during balancing. However, since these bounds are fixed, it may happen during matrix optimisation that they conflict with other constraints.…”
Section: The Problem Of Hysteresis In Forecasting and Backcastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the prior to remove infeasibilities is another issue that we should address. Such changes are common when applying Euro and GRAS methods, as is relaxing certain constraints (Lenzen et al, 2009;Tarancón & Del Río, 2005). Nonetheless, GRAS/SUT-RAS methods are usually quite stable (Valderas-Jaramillo et al, 2019, p. 437) and, thus, tend to converge more easily than do SUT-Euro methods under identical conditions (same prior and same targets).…”
Section: Common Features Of the Sut-euro Gras-1 And Other Bi-proportmentioning
confidence: 99%