1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00238342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projection of individual pyramidal tract neurons to lumbar motor nuclei of the monkey

Abstract: The projection of individual pyramidal tract (PT) neurons from the hindlimb area in the precentral gyrus of the cerebral cortex to the lumbar spinal cord was studied in the monkey by systematically searching for sites within identified regions of the spinal gray from which the PT neurons could be antidromically activated by local stimulation. All investigated neurons belonged to the fast conducting fraction of PT neurons. The following results were obtained. 1. Each PT neuron could be activated from more than … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the CM cells we have labeled may have connections with other muscles in addition to the one we injected. On the other hand, Asanuma et al (29) found that groups of PTNs that were simultaneously recorded from the same electrode sent at least one axon to a common motor nucleus in the spinal cord. They argued that this innervation pattern made it possible to construct focal, cortical efferent zones related to a single muscle even when the neurons in these zones branched widely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the CM cells we have labeled may have connections with other muscles in addition to the one we injected. On the other hand, Asanuma et al (29) found that groups of PTNs that were simultaneously recorded from the same electrode sent at least one axon to a common motor nucleus in the spinal cord. They argued that this innervation pattern made it possible to construct focal, cortical efferent zones related to a single muscle even when the neurons in these zones branched widely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in the size of motor fields for area 4 neurones is to be expected from the work of Fetz and colleagues who have shown both with operant conditioning and cross-correlation techniques that the discharge of a single cortical neurone may result in the co-activation of just one or of several different forelimb muscles (Fetz & Finnochio, 1975;Fetz, Cheney & German, 1976). The size of motor fields for corticospinal neurones probably depends on the degree to which their axons branch within the spinal cord (Shinoda, Zarzecki & Asanuma, 1979;Asanuma, Zarzecki, Jankowska, Hongo & Marcus, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single-fibre e.p.s.p.s. evoked in motoneurones either by individual group I a fibres or by individual corticospinal tract neurones are small, necessitating elaborate spatial summation to generate motor output (Burke & Nelson, 1966;Kuno & Miyahara, 1969;Mendell & Henneman, 1971;Watt, Stauffer, Taylor, Reinking & Stuart, 1976;Asanuma, Zarzecki, Jankowska, Hongo & Marcus, 1979;Kirkwood & Sears, 1981;Redman & Walmsley, 1982). Although this form of synaptic organization may be optimal for achieving smooth, co-ordinated muscular contractions it may reflect a fundamental difference in synaptic organization between sensory and motor nuclei.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%