2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projection of global warming onto regional precipitation over Mongolia using a regional climate model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
252
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
252
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 illustrates 11-year JJA-mean precipitation in the observation (APHRODITE), NCEP2, and CNTL. Obviously, precipitation in CNTL successfully captures detailed distribution of precipitation in East Asia that was originally absent in the reanalysis data, which agrees with previous studies (e.g., Xie et al 2006;Sato et al 2007b;De Sales and Xue 2011). NCEP2 significantly overestimates precipitation over southeastern Asia.…”
Section: Verification Of Dynamical Downscaling Of Precipitationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Figure 4 illustrates 11-year JJA-mean precipitation in the observation (APHRODITE), NCEP2, and CNTL. Obviously, precipitation in CNTL successfully captures detailed distribution of precipitation in East Asia that was originally absent in the reanalysis data, which agrees with previous studies (e.g., Xie et al 2006;Sato et al 2007b;De Sales and Xue 2011). NCEP2 significantly overestimates precipitation over southeastern Asia.…”
Section: Verification Of Dynamical Downscaling Of Precipitationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The second advantage was also reported by Sato et al (2007). The direct dynamical downscaling is contaminated by the model biases of the GCM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The conventional method of dynamical downscaling (hereafter; referred to as the direct dynamical downscaling) consists of some numerical simulations using a regional climate model (RCM) assuming the initial and lateral boundary conditions given by the General Circulation Models (GCMs). A new concept of the dynamical downscaling has been introduced by Kimura and Kitoh (2007) and Sato et al (2007). This method is almost the same as the direct dynamical downscaling but the lateral boundary condition of the RCM is a composite of the present reanalysis data and the difference of monthly mean values between the present climate and the future climate simulated by a GCM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If correct, this interpretation suggests that whilst pollen records indicate drier conditions immediately around Lake Baikal in the mid/late Holocene (Tarasov et al, 2007(Tarasov et al, , 2009, the higher δ 18 Odiatom records imply that long-term trends in precipitation elsewhere in the catchment and in particular to the south of the lake remained relatively constant between the early/late Holocene period, trends that are supported by individual records from northern Mongolian (Wang and Feng, With a relationship established between δ 18 Odiatom and regional Central Asian precipitation around Lake Baikal, records of precipitation from the lake have the potential to aid the development of future forecasts for the region. Models in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) are currently not able to confidently predict future changes in Central Asian precipitation (Christensen et al, 2013), but together with regional models they indicate the potential for decreases in precipitation for northern Mongolia and the Lake Baikal catchment, leading to associated reductions in soil moisture and increased vulnerability to drought and fire (Sato et al, 2007;Törnqvist et al, 2014). Data-model comparisons under the Paleoclimate Modelling…”
Section: Assessing the Fidelity Of The Holocene δ 18 O Diatom Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%