2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9991(03)00166-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projection methods for reduced order models of compressible flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two techniques, Galerkin projection and direct projection, have been recently reported as having potential for obtaining nonlinear terms for POD/ROMs. 13 However, the linear portion of these realization procedures is generally unstable, requiring dissipation techniques that affect model performance. The Volterra-POD approach provides a stable reduced-order equation set, and is an important advance toward achieving stable, nonlinear reduced-order models.…”
Section: Volterra Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two techniques, Galerkin projection and direct projection, have been recently reported as having potential for obtaining nonlinear terms for POD/ROMs. 13 However, the linear portion of these realization procedures is generally unstable, requiring dissipation techniques that affect model performance. The Volterra-POD approach provides a stable reduced-order equation set, and is an important advance toward achieving stable, nonlinear reduced-order models.…”
Section: Volterra Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8b). Primitive variables enable Galerkin projection for the fluid as a possible means for obtaining nonlinear terms 13 in future analysis. At Mach 1.2, LCO required about 300 time units to become fully developed, and the small, 25 time unit training window was shown to be adequate in previous work.…”
Section: Identification Of Fluid Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "intrusive" approach performs a Galerkin projection of the original partial differential equations (PDEs) onto the space spanned by the reduced basis, and then it solves a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for the coefficients of the linear combination [9,10]. A drawback of the Galerkin projection method is that it requires dealing with the mathematical/numerical substrate of the problem that is not always well defined or compatible with the snapshots available, such as when these snapshots are obtained from flight and/or experimental tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two projection methods for applying this strategy in problems governed by Euler equations are presented in Ref. 4 ROMs about aeroelasticity of airfoil 5,6 and turbine engine 7 have also been derived. But all these applications above ignored the fluid viscosity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%