2012
DOI: 10.1137/100802529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projection-like Retractions on Matrix Manifolds

Abstract: This paper deals with constructing retractions, a key step when applying optimization algorithms on matrix manifolds. For submanifolds of Euclidean spaces, we show that the operation consisting of taking a tangent step in the embedding Euclidean space followed by a projection onto the submanifold, is a retraction. We also show that the operation remains a retraction if the projection is generalized to a projection-like procedure that consists of coming back to the submanifold along "admissible" directions, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
230
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
230
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that, in the context of [5,6], PM induces a second-order retraction onM near A given by ∆ ∈ TM(A) → PM(A + ∆) ∈M, which locally fits the exponential mapping up to second order.…”
Section: Algorithm 36 (Projection Onto Fixed-rank Matrix Manifold VImentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We remark that, in the context of [5,6], PM induces a second-order retraction onM near A given by ∆ ∈ TM(A) → PM(A + ∆) ∈M, which locally fits the exponential mapping up to second order.…”
Section: Algorithm 36 (Projection Onto Fixed-rank Matrix Manifold VImentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With P N at hand, the global minimizer of the sparse matrix subproblem is computed as in step 1 of Algorithm 3.3 below. On the other hand, such a global minimizer does not necessarily guarantee a sufficient decrease in the objective as required by condition (6). When the global minimizer fails to fulfill condition (6), we resort to a local minimizer as specified by step 3 in Algorithm 3.3.…”
Section: Sparse Matrix (B-)subproblemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations