2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projection effects in galaxy cluster samples: insights from X-ray redshifts

Abstract: Up to now, the largest sample of galaxy clusters selected in X-rays comes from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS). Although there have been many interesting clusters discovered with the RASS data, the broad point spread function (PSF) of the ROSAT satellite limits the amount of spatial information of the detected objects. This leads to the discovery of new cluster features when a re-observation is performed with higher resolution X-ray satellites. Here we present the results from XMM-Newton observations of three … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilizing the FWC data, the Quiescent Particle Background (QPB) ) is modelled and then subtracted from the observation. We follow the procedure described in Ramos-Ceja et al (2019). First, the cleaned observation data is matched with the suitable FWC data and then this FWC template is re-projected to the sky position.…”
Section: Xmm-newtonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Utilizing the FWC data, the Quiescent Particle Background (QPB) ) is modelled and then subtracted from the observation. We follow the procedure described in Ramos-Ceja et al (2019). First, the cleaned observation data is matched with the suitable FWC data and then this FWC template is re-projected to the sky position.…”
Section: Xmm-newtonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is required to detect and excise the point sources, for example in the calculation of surface brightness profiles and spectral analysis. To detect the point sources in the observation, we implement the procedure described in Pacaud et al (2006) and Ramos-Ceja et al (2019). Firstly, wavelet filtering is applied on the combined detector image in the soft energy band (0.5 − 2.0 keV).…”
Section: Xmm-newtonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to compare the profiles from eROSITA with XMM-Newton, the eventfiles were obtained from the archive to perform analysis on. The analysis carried out in this work closely follows that described in Ramos-Ceja et al (2019). To summarise, flare filtering was carried out in order to identify and remove any soft proton flares that were present in the observation, CCDs that were in an anomalous state during the observation were removed, and the instrumental background and exposure were corrected for.…”
Section: Xmm-newtonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, cluster catalogues are hardly affected by projection effects (e.g. Ramos-Ceja et al 2019), namely the inclusion of spurious sources resulting from the projection of unrelated systems along the line of sight, because the centrally concentrated X-ray emission clearly indicates the presence of gas trapped in the potential well of a cluster (e.g. Frenk et al 1990;Reblinsky & Bartelmann 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%