The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Day 3 Thu, September 07, 2023 2023
DOI: 10.2118/215587-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projecting Petrophysical Logs at the Bit through Multi-Well Data Analysis with Machine Learning

A. Sharma,
T. Burak,
R. Nygaard
et al.

Abstract: The vertical distance from logging while drilling (LWD) sensors to the bit is often more than 30m (98 ft), which leads to difficulty in performing real-time comparison of LWD and drilling data. This study aims to predict the petrophysical data at the drill bit with the objective of determining the best supervised machine learning algorithm to incorporate to reduce the sensor offset problem. The bulk density and porosity logs are predicted at the bit in this paper using petrophysical and drilling parameters. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The workflow is visually represented in Figure 3, which illustrates the comprehensive steps involved: data collection, data processing, model training and testing, followed by efficient model selection. The comparative analysis of all regression models is performed based on the R-squared and error metrics as mentioned in [19][20][21] for efficient model selection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The workflow is visually represented in Figure 3, which illustrates the comprehensive steps involved: data collection, data processing, model training and testing, followed by efficient model selection. The comparative analysis of all regression models is performed based on the R-squared and error metrics as mentioned in [19][20][21] for efficient model selection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%