2013
DOI: 10.32890/jict.12.2013.8140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projecting Named Entity Tags From a Resource Rich Language to a Resource Poor Language

Abstract: Named Entities (NE) are the prominent entities appearing in textual documents. Automatic classification of NE in a textual corpus is a vital process in Information Extraction and Information Retrieval research. Named Entity Recognition (NER) is the identification of words in text that correspond to a pre-defined taxonomy such as person, organization, location, date, time, etc. This article focuses on the person (PER), organization (ORG) and location (LOC) entities for a Malay journalistic corpus of terrorism. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NER and NET Both tasks are often jointly learnt as a classification task which includes a category for wrods that are not named entities. Projection has been widely used in this task, either to learn a model on a HRL and applying it to a LRL (Zamin, 2020), or to train a classifier on the projected annotations from a HRL (Yarowsky et al, 2001). The early solutions to solve this task mainly involved Hidden Markovian Models (HMM), but they fail to handle named entity phrases and cannot model non-local dependencies along the sentence (Yarowsky et al, 2001).…”
Section: Named Entity Recognition Typing and Linkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NER and NET Both tasks are often jointly learnt as a classification task which includes a category for wrods that are not named entities. Projection has been widely used in this task, either to learn a model on a HRL and applying it to a LRL (Zamin, 2020), or to train a classifier on the projected annotations from a HRL (Yarowsky et al, 2001). The early solutions to solve this task mainly involved Hidden Markovian Models (HMM), but they fail to handle named entity phrases and cannot model non-local dependencies along the sentence (Yarowsky et al, 2001).…”
Section: Named Entity Recognition Typing and Linkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future work As (Zamin, 2020) reported, performance of NER systems is highly currently domain-specific ; some papers incentivize designing cross-domain techniques. The literature mentioned that conceiving a new metrics to compare cross-lingual embedding is promising avenue to XEL.…”
Section: Named Entity Recognition Typing and Linkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduced in 2001, annotation projection is the process of transferring annotations from one language to another language [17]. For instance, in order to build the first named entity annotated corpus for Malay, named entity tags have been projected from English (resource-rich) to Malay (low-resource) language with an F-score of 90% on their test set [18]. Based on a Malay-English align corpus, their method can be resume is three steps: they have firstly annotated the English part of the corpus using UIUC named entity tagger [14].…”
Section: Named Entity Recognition For Low-resource Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%