2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projecting environmental and krill fishery impacts on the Antarctic Peninsula food web in 2100

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 124 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, increased GCM resolution of 10 km has significantly decreased Spring SST bias in northwest Atlantic shelf waters (with zero bias in inner shelf waters in the Gulf of Maine and southern New England) (Saba et al 2016). Only recently have CMIP6 GCM output been used in fisheries projections (Fauchald et al 2021;Koul et al 2021;Testa et al 2022). Additionally, while previous fisheries models often include atmospheric forcing climate indices (e.g., ENSO and NAO) (Brunel and Boucher 2007;Caputi et al 2010;Muhling et al 2018), models rarely include direct measures of wind in projections, which have been shown to explain interannual recruitment variation (Churchill et al 2011;Hare et al 2015;Skagseth et al 2015) potentially due to larval transport and food supply mechanisms (Nakata et al 2000;Vikebø et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, increased GCM resolution of 10 km has significantly decreased Spring SST bias in northwest Atlantic shelf waters (with zero bias in inner shelf waters in the Gulf of Maine and southern New England) (Saba et al 2016). Only recently have CMIP6 GCM output been used in fisheries projections (Fauchald et al 2021;Koul et al 2021;Testa et al 2022). Additionally, while previous fisheries models often include atmospheric forcing climate indices (e.g., ENSO and NAO) (Brunel and Boucher 2007;Caputi et al 2010;Muhling et al 2018), models rarely include direct measures of wind in projections, which have been shown to explain interannual recruitment variation (Churchill et al 2011;Hare et al 2015;Skagseth et al 2015) potentially due to larval transport and food supply mechanisms (Nakata et al 2000;Vikebø et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%