2016
DOI: 10.1890/15-0750.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projected wetland densities under climate change: habitat loss but little geographic shift in conservation strategy

Abstract: Climate change poses major challenges for conservation and management because it alters the area, quality, and spatial distribution of habitat for natural populations. To assess species' vulnerability to climate change and target ongoing conservation investments, researchers and managers often consider the effects of projected changes in climate and land use on future habitat availability and quality and the uncertainty associated with these projections. Here, we draw on tools from hydrology and climate scienc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
91
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
3
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, when comparing the effects of climate change on wetland distribution under current climate scenarios with future climate scenarios, we used the historic climate data rather than the projected current climate data from the ensemble of the five GCMs in our modelling scenarios. The method might underestimate the uncertainty of the GCMs [79]. Nevertheless, our predicted results addressed our research questions and were generally consistent with previous research.…”
Section: Results Implications and Uncertaintiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Additionally, when comparing the effects of climate change on wetland distribution under current climate scenarios with future climate scenarios, we used the historic climate data rather than the projected current climate data from the ensemble of the five GCMs in our modelling scenarios. The method might underestimate the uncertainty of the GCMs [79]. Nevertheless, our predicted results addressed our research questions and were generally consistent with previous research.…”
Section: Results Implications and Uncertaintiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These losses are projected to continue due to land use change and variations in future climate conditions (Sofaer et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the ensembles we developed complement network‐based approaches for understanding patterns of co‐occurrence (Morueta‐Holme et al, ). Given ongoing land use (Rashford, Walker, & Bastian, ) and climate change (Johnson et al, ; Sofaer et al, ) in the PPR, evaluating whether explicit estimation of environmental sensitivities increases the stability of surrogate relationships will be important to more fully explore.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%