2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project Y: The search for clues explaining phenotype variability in MS

Abstract: Background: To study phenotypic variability in MS patients, well-defined unbiased cohort studies are necessary. The most common and probably most important confounding factor when studying disease phenotype in MS is age.Objective: To describe study design and subject characteristics of a unique birth cohort (Project Y). The overall aim of Project Y is to identify determinants associated with phenotypic variability in MS, eliminating the possibility of confounding by age. Methods: Project Y is a population-base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this cross-sectional study individuals with MS and healthy controls (HCs) were included from project Y, an observational cohort study of individuals with MS and HCs of the same birth year conducted at the Amsterdam University Medical Center (Amsterdam UMC), which is previously described (Loonstra et al, 2021). Project Y received approval from the medical ethical committee of the Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this cross-sectional study individuals with MS and healthy controls (HCs) were included from project Y, an observational cohort study of individuals with MS and HCs of the same birth year conducted at the Amsterdam University Medical Center (Amsterdam UMC), which is previously described (Loonstra et al, 2021). Project Y received approval from the medical ethical committee of the Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Dahlke et al ( 70 ) examined the clinical course in 34,987 MS patients who had entered into clinical trials (31,863 with relapsing-remitting MS, 1873 with secondarily progressive MS, and 986 with primary progressive MS) but did not characterize MS subjects further as to clinical phenotype. Other ongoing longitudinal studies have been undertaken to characterize MS clinical phenotypes ( 16 , 71 ) but they have not yet yielded new subtypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study, therefore, aimed to investigate the association between adipokines and disease severity in the different MS phenotypes. To remove potential bias effects of age, this was assessed in a cohort of PwMS and healthy controls (HC) of the same age (Project Y) [ 21 ]. We explored (1) differences in adiponectin, leptin and resistin levels in MS and how these relate to clinical, disability, and MRI measures, adjusted and unadjusted for BMI and (2) how BMI relates to clinical, disability and MRI measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%