2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2008.01034
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project to Adapt: Domain Adaptation for Depth Completion from Noisy and Sparse Sensor Data

Abstract: Depth completion aims to predict a dense depth map from a sparse depth input. The acquisition of dense ground truth annotations for depth completion settings can be difficult and, at the same time, a significant domain gap between real LiDAR measurements and synthetic data has prevented from successful training of models in virtual settings. We propose a domain adaptation approach for sparse-to-dense depth completion that is trained from synthetic data, without annotations in the real domain or additional sens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
(127 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depth completion has been carried out via combining multiple input modalities, for example, a sparse but accurate LiDAR signal in combination with RGB [58]. It is difficult to address sparse signals with CNNs [41] and LiDAR sensors can produce problematic artifacts resulting in unreliable Ground Truth depth estimates [39]. One strategy towards removing dependence on this form of supervision are self-supervision cues however these fall behind supervised pipelines in terms of accuracy [40].…”
Section: Depth With Multiple Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depth completion has been carried out via combining multiple input modalities, for example, a sparse but accurate LiDAR signal in combination with RGB [58]. It is difficult to address sparse signals with CNNs [41] and LiDAR sensors can produce problematic artifacts resulting in unreliable Ground Truth depth estimates [39]. One strategy towards removing dependence on this form of supervision are self-supervision cues however these fall behind supervised pipelines in terms of accuracy [40].…”
Section: Depth With Multiple Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%