Project Monitoring and Control Measures In CMMI

Khraiwesh, Mahmoud

doi:10.5121/ijcsit.2013.5503

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Various researches aimed to measure the software process that has been suggested, such as [21,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. The works that are related the most to our work are represented in the works of [21,31,32,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Baumertand McWhinney [42] point out to several observations that are usefulfor measuring the practices (general characteristics) that are defined in the Capability Maturity Model for CMM/SW.…”

Section: The Relevant Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Measures of Organizational Training in the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)

Khraiwesh¹

2020

IJACSA

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Training has a major impact on organizational commitment. Organizational objectives can be met by executing several training strategies and programs to enhance training. Organizational training aimed at developing employees' knowledge and skills. It shall enable employees to carry out their duties efficiently and effectively. Two goals and seven practices of the organizational training process area in the capability maturity model integration (CMMI) framework are analyzed through this study. That's done to set common measures for organizational training. CMMI is a framework for assessing and improving software systems. The researcher implemented the Goal Questions Metrics (GQM) model on two objectives and seven specific practices of the organizational training process area in CMMI. That's done to set measures.The researcher confirmed that the defined measures are the true measure for each one of the seven specific practices.

show abstract

Section: The Relevant Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Loconsole [13] (CMM/SW), rather than (CMMI/SW). Khraiwesh, [31,[35][36][37][38][39]41] identifies a set of measures for processessuch as validation, process and product quality assurance, risk management, project planning, project monitoring and control, and configuration management in CMMI/SW.…”

Section: The Relevant Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measures of Organizational Training in the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)

Khraiwesh¹

2020

IJACSA

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many software measures researches have been suggested in the literature, some of them are[5] [14] [17] [21] [22] [23] [24] [28] [32]. The most related to our work are [5] [28] [32] [21] [22] [23] and[24]. The study of Baumert and McWhinney[5] defines a set of indicators that are convenient with the measurement practice (a common features) described in the Capability Maturity Model for CMM/SW.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Process and Product Quality Assurance Measures in CMMI

Khraiwesh¹

2014

IJCSES

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Process and product quality assurance are very important aspects in development of software. Process and product quality assurance monitor the software engineering processes and methods to ensure quality. It is the process of confirming and verifying that whether services and products meet the customer expectation or not. This research will identify general measures for the specific goals and its specific practices of Process and Product Quality Assurance Process Area in Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI). CMMI is developed by Software Engineering Institute (SEI) in Carnegie Mellon University in USA. CMMI is a framework for assessment and improvement of computer information systems. The procedure we used to determine the measures is to apply the Goal Questions Metrics (GQM) approach to the two specific goals and its four specific practices of Process and Product Quality Assurance Process Area in CMMI.

show abstract

Prioritized Risks and Treatment Strategies in Global Software Development (Gsd)

Hasni,

Masbah,

Elhasady

2021

JAU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study conducts a review for the literature in order to compile the risks that are directly related to the GSD strategy. The case study adopts a Delphi methodology that allows the researcher to achieve consensus on the most relevant and critical risks associated with the GSD project. Twenty software development experts from all around the world participated in the study, with a minimum of fifteen expert in each Delphi round. The four rounds of the Delphi method used in this study are designed to gain consensus on the most crucial risks of the GSD strategy, as well as perform a risk assessment for all the risks compiled from the literature and verified by the participating experts. The results show that there are ten main risks that gained consensus by software development experts and need to be addressed as a priority in GSD projects, where all of them have medium to high probability of occurrence and impact on the software project success using a GSD strategy.

show abstract

Project Monitoring and Control Measures In CMMI

Cited by 3 publications

References 24 publications

Measures of Organizational Training in the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)

Measures of Organizational Training in the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)

Process and Product Quality Assurance Measures in CMMI

Prioritized Risks and Treatment Strategies in Global Software Development (Gsd)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About