2019
DOI: 10.1108/s2516-285320190000002057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project Managers: Gatekeepers or Inside Men?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the general outline of P/A-theory outlined above, this means that 1) there will probably be a lack of goal alignment between the sub-contractors and the project client; 2) that there will be a severe information asymmetry problem due to the organisational form of the project and that 3) this will probably mean that the client (dependent on the number of levels of sub-contractors involved) will have little to no information of what actually happens at the level of the organisation where actual physical work is carried outincluding being aware or not of criminal activity. Gunnerud et al (2019) explore opportunistic behaviour from project managers following such an analysis. As Lohne et al (2019b) illustrated, this fuzzy landscape can serve project clients quite wellthey benefit from criminal activity that they do not know of.…”
Section: Agency Problems Within the Norwegian Aec-industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the general outline of P/A-theory outlined above, this means that 1) there will probably be a lack of goal alignment between the sub-contractors and the project client; 2) that there will be a severe information asymmetry problem due to the organisational form of the project and that 3) this will probably mean that the client (dependent on the number of levels of sub-contractors involved) will have little to no information of what actually happens at the level of the organisation where actual physical work is carried outincluding being aware or not of criminal activity. Gunnerud et al (2019) explore opportunistic behaviour from project managers following such an analysis. As Lohne et al (2019b) illustrated, this fuzzy landscape can serve project clients quite wellthey benefit from criminal activity that they do not know of.…”
Section: Agency Problems Within the Norwegian Aec-industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge to their efficiency seems to be the challenges of reducing project organisations' complexity, given the endeavour's complexity, see Haugen et al (2017). Gunnerud et al (2019) found that even though the contracts intend to restrict the possibilities for criminal activities, project managers have substantial room for manoeuvre for criminal activities.…”
Section: Measures For Countering Criminal Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was therefore established that available controls had gaps that allowed work related criminal activities to continue. Evjen, et al (2019) cited the main problems as: warnings; procurement and bureaucratic process which were a hindrance to effective control of subcontractors. Reduced number of reporting authorities or tiers was suggested as one measure of controlling criminal activities.…”
Section: Sub-contractor Oversight and Real Estate Construction Projects Cost Overrunsmentioning
confidence: 99%