Project Management Methods, Guides and Standards: A Critical Overview

Abdullah, Abdul Aziz; Abdul-Samad, Zulkiflee; Abdul‐Rahman, Hamzah; Salleh, Hafez

doi:10.22452/jpmp.vol1no1.3

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…PRINCE2 also emphasizes a product-focused approach, which helps to deliver projects that meet requirements and contribute value to the organization. Additionally, its well-defined framework supports clear communication among project stakeholders, fostering a common language and understanding that enhances project outcomes [26].…”

Section: Projects In Controlled Environments (Prince2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The methodology requires significant investment in training and certification to be effectively implemented, which might be a barrier for smaller organizations or teams. Moreover, the emphasis on documentation and process can sometimes lead to bureaucratic overhead, potentially slowing down project progress if not managed carefully [26][27][28].…”

Section: Projects In Controlled Environments (Prince2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Framework for Implementing Industry 4.0 Projects

Raddi-Mira,

Pecora Junior,

Deschamps

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a structured framework for implementing Industry 4.0 projects. The framework is developed through an extensive review of the existing literature, wherein potential challenges and success factors related to adopting disruptive technologies in such projects are systematically analyzed and categorized. Additionally, the authors introduce a semi-structured questionnaire tailored for interviews with key decision-makers in companies strategically pursuing digital transformation. This questionnaire is designed to elicit valuable insights based on the experiences and perspectives of these decision-makers. The resulting framework is synthesized from the interviews and literature review. It delineates the essential steps necessary for the effective implementation of Industry 4.0 projects, focusing on establishing strategic priorities as the foundational stage of the entire process.

show abstract

Section: Projects In Controlled Environments (Prince2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Projects In Controlled Environments (Prince2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Framework for Implementing Industry 4.0 Projects

Raddi-Mira,

Pecora Junior,

Deschamps

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…LCCFC is divided into two approaches: (i) city-based (mitigating all LCCF criteria) and (ii) one-system (mitigating one or some LCCF criteria). Abdullah et al, (2011) who emphasise empowering local authorities' power and responsibility. These responsibilities consist of regulating land use and promoting more desirable social and environmental planning towards sustainable development.…”

Section: Low Carbon Cities Framework Checklist (Lccfc)mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Low Carbon Cities Framework Checklist (Lccfc) Implementation on Community Satisfaction Level

Juhari,

Omar,

Kamaruddin

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Local authorities (LA) have been serving as leaders in their communities to implement the Low Carbon Cities Framework (LCCF). LCCFC, although carefully developed, has not been effectively utilised. This paper aimed to study the effect of LCCFC implementation on community satisfaction levels. The objectives of this paper were: (i) to determine the implementation of LCCFC in relation to community satisfaction, (ii) to analyse the levels of community satisfaction across economic, social, and environmental aspects, and (iii) to suggest strategies and frameworks for enhancing community satisfaction. A mixed method approach was employed, which encompassed both an interview and a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire survey reached a sample size of 400 participants, drawn from six distinct neighbourhood areas within the jurisdiction of the Subang Jaya Municipal Council. Meanwhile, the interview was conducted with town planners within a Local Authority (LA) as key stakeholders, alongside the community. The qualitative data was analysed using Atlas Ti, while the quantitative data was via SPSS. The findings of the present study reveal that the utilisation of the LCCF checklist by the local authority concerned is currently inadequate, thereby necessitating the identification of strategies for improvement and the formulation of action plans to enhance community contentment. It is recommended that the findings of the current study be utilised as a point of reference by other local authorities, thereby constituting a significant advancement in the pursuit of accelerating sustainable development.

show abstract

“…The international specification ISO10006:20017 through what is referred to it [10], is called "Quality Management, Guiding Principles for Quality Management in Projects" and was issued in November 2017, the third version of this series of specifications. It was preceded by (ISO10006:1997) and (ISO10006:2003).…”

Section: Iso10006:20017mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Application of Quality Management Systems in Projects Quality Management Guidelines According to the Specification ISO 10006:2017: A Case Study in the Department of Engineering Construction

Ruaa Khaled Jumaa,

Areej Saeed Khaleel

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research aims, to identify the level of application of the quality management system in projects by ISO10006:2017, and to determine the size of the gap, between the actual reality and project operations within the seventh requirement of the specification, to achieve sustainable development. The case study method was adopted, and the reality of the application of the quality management system in projects was diagnosed. In the residential complex of Sumo Oil. The sample of the research. The data and information collection were mainly based on the checklist. Which included seven axes to evaluate the application of the quality management system in projects. A set of statistical methods were adopted, including (weighted arithmetic mean, percentage measurement, and gap size measurement). The research reached a set of important results, about the reality of the application of the system Quality management in projects. The most important of which was that the level of actual application of the seventh requirement of the specification in the surveyed department, was 94%, and the size of a gap of 6% was distributed among the procurement processes and operations related to risks and time, The value added value is to link the achievement of the seventh item requirements of the standard to achieve the dimensions of sustainable development.

show abstract

Project Management Methods, Guides and Standards: A Critical Overview

Cited by 5 publications

References 19 publications

Framework for Implementing Industry 4.0 Projects

Framework for Implementing Industry 4.0 Projects

The Effects of Low Carbon Cities Framework Checklist (Lccfc) Implementation on Community Satisfaction Level

Evaluation of the Application of Quality Management Systems in Projects Quality Management Guidelines According to the Specification ISO 10006:2017: A Case Study in the Department of Engineering Construction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About