1990
DOI: 10.1080/01446199000000014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project management: Dynamics and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the studied case, subversion of the project sponsor role in structuring the construction practitioner and client interface prevented the project organisation and management style from reaching maturity. In Sidwell's (1990) "Outward looking > Iterative > Sequential > Focused" process maturity model, the project became stuck at the "iterative" stage of development. Sidwell suggests that, during design development, project organisational should allow for iteration between client and practitioners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studied case, subversion of the project sponsor role in structuring the construction practitioner and client interface prevented the project organisation and management style from reaching maturity. In Sidwell's (1990) "Outward looking > Iterative > Sequential > Focused" process maturity model, the project became stuck at the "iterative" stage of development. Sidwell suggests that, during design development, project organisational should allow for iteration between client and practitioners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powerful coalitions with shared ambitions. Large scale infrastructure projects are subject to an array of influences, from regulatory control to political and industrial intervention (Sidwell, 1990). Creating an ambition that inspires all stakeholders is important for any change initiative.…”
Section: The Batteries Of Change Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of performance can be obtained through the level of success or failure in terms of schedule, cost and functionality (Sidwell, 1990). Downtime variance for building maintenance is often used in measuring the performance of buildings.…”
Section: Maintenance Performancementioning
confidence: 99%