2007 International Conference on Systems Engineering and Modeling 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icsem.2007.373327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project Management and Software Development Processes: Integrating RUP and PMBOK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
22

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
10
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it must be noted that if the organisation needs to customise the PMBOK framework, this can take substantial resources, especially time, effort and money, which should be taken into consideration. All the issues highlighted reflect the finding that the management processes outlined in PMBOK are generic and descriptive, which is consistent with the claim in previous studies [5]- [10].…”
Section: End-user Training Provisionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, it must be noted that if the organisation needs to customise the PMBOK framework, this can take substantial resources, especially time, effort and money, which should be taken into consideration. All the issues highlighted reflect the finding that the management processes outlined in PMBOK are generic and descriptive, which is consistent with the claim in previous studies [5]- [10].…”
Section: End-user Training Provisionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…By blending a project management framework and software process improvement, or other excellent software development processes, we believe one can address all the critical success factors to a better degree. This is supported by several research efforts that seek integration between a few areas, such as traditional project management and agile (Hass, 2007), CMMI for Development (CMMI-Dev) and PMBOK (von Wangenheim et al, 2010), PMBOK and Rational Unified Process (Callegari and Bastos, 2007), agile and PRINCE (Nawrocki et al, 2006), CMMI and PMBOK (Jenkins, 2005) and many more in order to ensure better control in managing software projects. A study conducted by Bayo et al (2007) showed that there has been increasing demand in the knowledge and application of quality software to improve the country socio-economic growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on software and IT projects had been discussed in the research papers [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Authors had explored not only the standard project management methodologies like PMBOK, Prince2, RUP but also the new practices of Agile, JAD, RAD, extreme programming.…”
Section: Project Management In It/ Software Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore standard project management methodologies only may not be sufficient for managing project in this area. These methodologies may have to enhance and that's the reason that Agile, JAD, RAD, extreme programming have been developed [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The studies also showed that project management methodologies/ models should be customised/ tailored for the different projects so as to best fit the scenario and hence avoid unnecessary details and reduce cost and time.…”
Section: -76mentioning
confidence: 99%