2007
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2007)23:4(200)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project Delivery System Selection under Uncertainty: Multicriteria Multilevel Decision Aid Model

Abstract: Fereshteh Mafakheri, candidate for the degree of Master of Applied Science, has presented a thesis titled, Project Delivery System Selection Under Uncertainty: A Multi-Criteria Multi-Level Decision Aid Model, in an oral examination held on June 28, 2006. The following committee members have found the thesis acceptable in form and content, and that the candidate demonstrated satisfactory knowledge of the subject material.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, many scholars made improvements to the original AHP method. Mafakheri et al [7] used rough set theory to construct an AHP decision model for PDM selection under uncertain conditions; Khanzdi et al [8] combined fuzzy decision and AHP and proposed the fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making model for the selection of the project delivery method. Both Teak et al [9] and Lu et al [10] considered the fact that the decision-making factors affecting the project delivery method are mutually influenced and interrelated and developed the analytic network process (ANP) model on the basis of AHP for PDS decision.…”
Section: Decision-making Methods For Project Transaction Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, many scholars made improvements to the original AHP method. Mafakheri et al [7] used rough set theory to construct an AHP decision model for PDM selection under uncertain conditions; Khanzdi et al [8] combined fuzzy decision and AHP and proposed the fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making model for the selection of the project delivery method. Both Teak et al [9] and Lu et al [10] considered the fact that the decision-making factors affecting the project delivery method are mutually influenced and interrelated and developed the analytic network process (ANP) model on the basis of AHP for PDS decision.…”
Section: Decision-making Methods For Project Transaction Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have discussed the selection of a PDS through the quantitative approach [1,9,10,13,26,27]. But limited studies have discussed the selection of PDSs through the qualitative approach.…”
Section: Previous Research On Pds Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But limited studies have discussed the selection of PDSs through the qualitative approach. With respect to the quantitative approach, many authors use the analytical hierarchy process in their research to propose models or frameworks to assist in PDS selection [1,9,13,26]. To improve the precision of PDS selection in a quantitative approach, a research study managed to combine artificial neural network and data envelopment analysis in their PDS selection model [10].…”
Section: Previous Research On Pds Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mahdi and Alreshaid [57] divided the factors into seven categories that affect the identification of the optimum house construction delivery approach, that is, owner characteristics; project characteristics; design characteristics; regulatory; contractor characteristics; risk; and claims and disputes, and 34 factors were included in these seven categories. Mafakheri et al [58] determined 13 factors through survey without making a classification. Ghavamifar [19] categorized the group of factors that should be considered when comparing the DBB, DB, and CMR into five groups: project-level issues, agency-level issues, public policy/regulatory issues, life cycle issues, and other issues.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Pdcs Designmentioning
confidence: 99%