1999
DOI: 10.1006/jvci.1999.0416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive Video Coding for Noisy Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the same set of parameters for the CRC parity checker and RCPC channel coder 10,7,8 : N = 200, c = 16, and m = 6. We focused on bit error rates (BER) of = 0.01 and 0.001, because the BER's of most wireless communication channels are = 0.01 -0.001.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used the same set of parameters for the CRC parity checker and RCPC channel coder 10,7,8 : N = 200, c = 16, and m = 6. We focused on bit error rates (BER) of = 0.01 and 0.001, because the BER's of most wireless communication channels are = 0.01 -0.001.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve robust video over noisy channels, the work of Sherwood and Zeger 5,6 was extended to progressive video coding by Kim et al They have shown in Ref. 7,8 that the robustness is increased when we cascade the 3-D SPIHT coder with rate-compatible punctured convolutional (RCPC) channel coder 9 and automatic repeat request (ARQ) to protect the 3-D SPIHT bitstream from being corrupted by channel errors. This approach increases robustness, but is still susceptible to early decoding failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve robust video over noisy channels, Kim et al 10 utilized the same RCPC code as Sherwood and Zeger 6,7 with 3D SPIHT, and found that a single automatic repeat request(ARQ) was also necessary to adequately protect the bit stream. ARQ, however, may not be feasible in certain scenarios and has the unfortunate consequence of increasing traffic on already congested channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They then apply Kim's method [13] [14] of RCPC channel coding as the forward-error correction (FEC) to every packet to protect the data. It is interesting to note that the scheme proposed in [15] could be used inline with any error-resilient coding method to alleviate the effect of error propagation by adding some periodic macroblocks in every fifth inter-frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%