2012
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m112.363259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive Structuring of a Branched Antimicrobial Peptide on the Path to the Inner Membrane Target

Abstract: Background: A cationic branched peptide was designed with antimicrobial activities against Gram-negative bacteria. Results: B2088 penetrated the outer membrane through inducing phase transitions of LPS and caused inner membrane depolarization by lipid redistribution. Conclusion: Our findings support the interfacial activity model and extend it to more complex interfaces. Significance: We provide a functional structural motif for developing new antimicrobials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, when the bacterial outer membrane is perturbed, the dye can partition into the interior of an outer membrane, thereby exhibiting an increase in fluorescence emission intensity 27. 28 A fast increase in NPN fluorescence emission intensity was observed upon addition of Sub3 (Figure 3 C), thus suggesting that it binds promptly to the outer membrane and facilitates the permeation of NPN. A comparison of Sub3 with melittin suggests that Sub3 interacts faster than melittin with the outer membrane but perturbs it to a lesser extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, when the bacterial outer membrane is perturbed, the dye can partition into the interior of an outer membrane, thereby exhibiting an increase in fluorescence emission intensity 27. 28 A fast increase in NPN fluorescence emission intensity was observed upon addition of Sub3 (Figure 3 C), thus suggesting that it binds promptly to the outer membrane and facilitates the permeation of NPN. A comparison of Sub3 with melittin suggests that Sub3 interacts faster than melittin with the outer membrane but perturbs it to a lesser extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For outer membrane permeability assasys, NPN was added to 2 × 10 6 E. coli ATCC 25922 cells/mL (final NPN concentration of 20 μM) and incubated for 15 min with varying concentrations (64 to 0.015 μg/mL) of lipopeptides with the fluorescence emission intensity recorded (λ exc = 340 nm, λ em = 405 nm) using a Polarstar-Omega (BMG) spectrophotometer to evaluate NPN uptake by the bacterial cells (Bai, et al, 2012; Loh, et al, 1984). For cytoplasmic membrane depolarisation assasys, mid-log phase (OD ~ 0.6) E. coli ATCC 25922 cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 5 mM HEPES, 20 mM glucose, pH 7.4.…”
Section: Star Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike conventional antibiotics, which generally target metabolic enzymes, AMPs act mainly by membrane‐targeting mechanisms and are selective due to the difference in charge of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cell membranes. Furthermore, AMPs have faster antimicrobial activity than conventional antibiotics . Generally speaking, AMPs can be divided into two mechanistic classes: membrane disruptive and non‐membrane disruptive (acting on intracellular targets).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%