2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2971269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive RSS Data Augmenter With Conditional Adversarial Networks

Abstract: Accuracies of most fingerprinting approaches for WiFi-based indoor localization applications are affected by the qualities of fingerprint databases, which are time-consuming and labor-intensive. Recently, many methods have been proposed to reduce the localization accuracy reliance on the qualities of the established fingerprint databases. However, studies on establishing fingerprint databases are relatively rare under the condition of sparse reference points. In this paper, we propose a novel data augmenter ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DataLoc+ [27], on the other hand, uses the fingerprint data measured on a single floor of a hospital, which reflects many devices and the movement of people carrying them in the hospital. In the cases of the CAN [43], DL Approach [44], and Between-Location [45] methods, small-scale, proprietary, single-floor databases are used, where it would be easier to obtain the details of the internal building structure and choose the optimal locations of APs and RPs based on them for the improvement of the stability of radio maps; in these cases, the results presented in the papers cannot be reproduced by other researchers.…”
Section: Comparison To Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DataLoc+ [27], on the other hand, uses the fingerprint data measured on a single floor of a hospital, which reflects many devices and the movement of people carrying them in the hospital. In the cases of the CAN [43], DL Approach [44], and Between-Location [45] methods, small-scale, proprietary, single-floor databases are used, where it would be easier to obtain the details of the internal building structure and choose the optimal locations of APs and RPs based on them for the improvement of the stability of radio maps; in these cases, the results presented in the papers cannot be reproduced by other researchers.…”
Section: Comparison To Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type Notes Proposed High Multi-Building Multi-Floor MOGP s-GAN [26] Low Single-Floor GAN DataLoc+ [27] Low Single-Floor Dropout DL Augmentation [25] Low Single-Floor Deep Learning CAN [43] Low Single-Floor Conditional Adversarial Networks DL Approach [44] Low Single-Floor AlexNet Between-Location [45] Low Single-Floor Between-Class Learning As for the s-GAN [26], because it only provides the results of single-floor data augmentation and localization for Building 1 Floor 2 of the UJIIndoorLoc database, we also applied the proposed MOGP-based data augmentation for the same building and floor and obtained the 2D localization error using the hierarchical RNN for comparison, as summarized in Table 12. Unlike the proposed scheme, the s-GAN uses a GAN to generate augmented RSSI data, associates pseudo-labels with the generated data using semi-supervised learning, and filters out inappropriate augmented RSSI data before location estimation.…”
Section: Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [139] demonstrate the feasibility of data augmentation using deep neural networks (DNNs), and the authors of [140] use data augmentation to reduce the number of required site surveys and improve location accuracy. In [141], the authors propose a novel data augmentation technique based on a conditional adversarial network to handle the sparsity of RPs.…”
Section: ) Autoencodersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, such approaches require increased time and heavy costs. To address this issue, several studies have been conducted on walking surveys [ 12 , 13 ], crowd sourcing [ 14 , 15 ], and data augmentation [ 16 , 17 ]. A walking survey [ 18 , 19 ] is the most common RSSI measurement approach, and it directly measures the receiver strength while moving along a predetermined path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%