Progressive Politics in a Changing World: Challenging the Fallacies of Blue Labour

Abstract

In Britain and across Europe, the social alliances that sustained progressive politics for a century are disintegrating. The financial crisis of 2007–8 showed that Labour and its ‘third way’ European followers had got the economics of modern capitalism wrong. With the mainstream left compromised, it has been the nationalist right that has benefitted, re‐defining politics around issues of nation, culture and identity. What is surprising is the number of influential voices across the centre and left of politics who have accepted much of this far‐right analysis and adopted its language and terminology. These trends, especially post‐Brexit, have crystallised in the UK around the label of ‘Blue Labour’. This article examines the fallacies and flaws of the Blue Labour tendency in four key areas—class, economy, family and race—and suggests alternative ways forward, which seek to forge rather than disrupt alliances between the working class and new social movements.

Diagnosing the voids of knowledge in the transformation process in managing and standardizing smart city development: the case of the government of Indonesia

“…Secondly, this research finds that 50 smart city projects in Indonesia have not been fully integrated, owing to poor learning outcomes among developers (Appio et al, 2019;Bloomfield, 2019;Armstrong and Manitsky, 2022). We explain that Central GoI's substantive knowledge does not enable positive outcomes of smart city projects.…”

Saving Liberalism from Itself

“…In many parts of the world, this agenda is encapsulated in the slogan 'faith, flag, and family'. This 'back to basics' agenda seems so intuitively plausible that politicians of the left flock back to it every time they are faced with losing an election (Bloomfield 2020;Duyvendak and Kešić 2022). But this is to reproduce exactly the logic I am seeking to push against in this book, a logic shared by unimaginative liberals and postliberals alike: that we are faced with a stark choice between the supposedly homogeneous communities of the past and a free but lonely future.…”

Anywheres, Somewheres, local attachment, and civic participation

“…1 See also the exchange between Bloomfield (2020aBloomfield ( , 2020b and Goodwin and Kaufmann (2020). The cosmopolitancommunitarian distinction often features in think tanks' discussion papers (e.g., Cliffe, 2015;Edgar, 2017), newspapers articles (e.g., Bagehot columnist, 2016;Coman, 2021), and the blogosphere too (e.g., Embery, 2021b;Roussinos, 2020).…”