Progressive or problematic? A comparative analysis of media depictions of demands to defund the police

Abstract

PurposeThe current study examines the media's depiction of demands to defund the police. Although this call to action has been a part of the public discourse for decades, the call has reached mainstream attention following the police-involved death of George Floyd in May 2020. Black Lives Matter, the American Civil Liberties Union, Color of Change, and other prominent organizations have endorsed this call. However, there is a lack of agreement on the “correct” meaning of this socio-political movement.Design/methodology/approachThe authors performed an inductive content analysis of the news articles using MaxQDA, a qualitative data analysis program. The authors focus on the text and its themes and patterns in the descriptions of #DefundThePolice, both implicit (e.g. tone) and explicit (e.g. defining the movement as problematic). The codes were further refined following open coding to fully develop the existing patterns. The results are organized by the themes within the articles. The findings also include direct quotes to reinforce the themes.FindingsIn the authors' content analysis of news reports, the authors find that the US and UK news outlets report definitions that parallel the M4BL's description of the movement. In this respect, media coverage reflected the basic tenets of the movement accurately as opposed to using definitions that misrepresent the group's primary objective. Although these sampled news articles generally adhered to the basic description of the defund movement, the authors found that the overall substance and tone of coverage varied across outlets. This divergence yielded five overarching themes that included: the involvement of corporate America in the defunding debate, the frequent use of opinion pieces, mentions of history for informing the debate, the inclusion of the police perspective, and reporting that seemed to tie the defund movement to increases in violent crime.Originality/valueThis article explores how the mass media reports and defines the #DefundThePolice movement. Although much debate surrounds this issue, there is limited understanding of the mainstream news media's depiction of the movement. The current study addresses this research gap and informs the defunding debate by examining whether media descriptions of the movement coincide with the Movement for Black Lives benchmark delineation.

Informal social control and the endorsement of police legitimacy: A confirmatory factor analysis

“…Finally, there is a growing media discourse around the fears to public safety that abolitionist praxis would bring (Craig & Reid, 2022). My research adds to the growing literature that calls for the reevaluation of how we determine neighborhood safety.…”

COVID-19, Diffuse Anxiety, and Public (Mis)Trust in Government: Empirical Insights and Implications for Crime and Justice

“…Crime—especially violent crimes and hate crimes—increased dramatically in only a 1-year span (Gramlich, 2021; Hernandez, 2021; Kishi & Jones, 2020; Rosenfeld et al, 2021; Sganga, 2021), contributing to historic increases in public fear of crime (McCarthy, 2020). The police-involved killing of George Floyd Jr. spurred nationwide demonstrations (Buchanan et al, 2020; Putnam et al, 2020) that highlighted racial injustice in American law enforcement and sparked calls to defund or even abolish the police (Craig & Reid, 2022; Movement for Black Lives, 2020; Muhammad, 2020). Political instability was high (Hartigan et al, 2021; Kishi & Jones, 2020), and concerns about the integrity of the impending presidential election were prevalent (see Enders et al, 2021).…”

White Violence, Black Victims: The Impact of Political and Economic Competition on Interracial Killings in 21st Century America

“…Scholars argue that the mechanisms, ideologies, and social emotions implicated in “Trump’s America” are, at their core, rooted in White racial hegemony (Bobo, 2017; Bonilla-Silva, 2019). Given the character of Trump-era racial politics (Bobo, 2017; see generally, Reid & Craig, 2021), trending political polarization (Hegland et al, 2022), and the proliferation of far-reaching pro-Black social movements and political claims-making (Cobbina-Dungy et al, 2022; Craig & Reid, 2022), future research would do well to expand the current analysis and examine the connection between race-based political conflicts and patterns of interracial killings in Trump’s America. Indeed, such an investigation could also go beyond race-specific homicide offending, exploring other outcomes of racial violence, such as right-wing extremist violence and hate crimes more generally.…”