2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-019-01164-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive failure of buildings under landslide impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A concrete element was allowed to erode when it reached a principal tensile fracture strain of 0.001 [26,37]. An effective plastic failure strain of 0.1 was adopted for the rebar [30].…”
Section: Masonry Structure Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A concrete element was allowed to erode when it reached a principal tensile fracture strain of 0.001 [26,37]. An effective plastic failure strain of 0.1 was adopted for the rebar [30].…”
Section: Masonry Structure Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hourglass control was used with viscous form. Although the adopted method did not capture all the features of natural flow materials, the method has been proved to be feasible to reflect the fundamental physical nature well [12,30].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, methods to investigate the travel distance of a landslide can be divided into two categories (Hungr et al, 2005), i.e., 1analytical or numerical methods based on the physical laws of solid and fluid dynamics (Scheidegger, 1973), which are often solved numerically (e.g. Hungr and McDougall, 2009;Luo et al, 2019) and…”
Section: P F P F Sr P Sr P F Mr P Mr P F Lr P Lrmentioning
confidence: 99%