1978
DOI: 10.3109/13813457809055940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive alteration of somatosensory evoked potential waveforms with lowering of cerebral tissue Po2in the rabbit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 -5 Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) is altered by systemic insults such as oligemia 6 -7 anemia, 8 intracranial hypertension, 9 and hypoxia. 10 The changes in superficially recorded waves during systemic oxygen deprivation 6 -8 -l0 are similar to those recorded when the cortical region (somatosensory cortex) is directly involved" and therefore may be as useful in quantitating the degree of insult in generalized insult as in localized insult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…4 -5 Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) is altered by systemic insults such as oligemia 6 -7 anemia, 8 intracranial hypertension, 9 and hypoxia. 10 The changes in superficially recorded waves during systemic oxygen deprivation 6 -8 -l0 are similar to those recorded when the cortical region (somatosensory cortex) is directly involved" and therefore may be as useful in quantitating the degree of insult in generalized insult as in localized insult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In fact, some authors report only latency changes during reduced oxygen intake [Deecke et al, 1976;Fowler and Lindeis, 1992;Lucertini et al, 1993], which should mainly indicate a prolonged impulse transmission time at the level of synapses. On the other hand, other data indicates only amplitude variations [Colin et al, 1978;Sohmer et al, 1982Sohmer et al, , 1989, that would rather suggest a decreased synchronism in neural discharge. Finally, in some papers, both latency and amplitude were affected by hypoxia [Kida and Imai, 1993;Sohmer et al, 1986a, b].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As a matter of fact, Sohmer et al [1986b] reported on cats that visual, somatosensory and vestibular evoked responses are not as sensitive to hypoxia as brainstem and cortical AEPs. On the contrary, in different animal models, Colin et al [1978] andMc Pherson et al [1986] detected changes in somatosensory evoked potentials. In man, visually and auditory evoked P300 responses are identically sensitive even to mild levels of hypoxaemia [Fowler and Prlic, 1995].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[65] Severe progressive hypoxia is associated with a decrease in SSEP amplitude and increase in latency ultimately leading to complete loss of cortical SSEPs. [66] Cortical SSEPs are more sensitive than spinal and subcortical responses, presumably because the latter are more tolerant of hypoxia than cerebral cortex, because of their lower metabolic rate. [67] Early response to ischaemia or hypoxia can manifest as a transient increase in SSEP amplitude (injury potential) before amplitude decreases and latency is prolonged.…”
Section: Non-anaesthetic Intra-operative Factors Affecting Evoked Potmentioning
confidence: 99%