1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00687709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progression in nemaline myopathy

Abstract: Four of seven patients with nemaline myopathy had severe, rapidly progressing symptoms. These four showed an increase in acid phosphatase activity in muscle fibers demonstrated by histochemistry and cathepsin B&L activity by biochemical measurement. On electron microscopy, nemaline bodies, occasionally disorganized myofibrils and autophagic vacuoles containing sarcoplasmic debris and glycogen particles were seen. Focal myofibrillar degeneration, through an unknown pathogenetic mechanism, induces an increase in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The myopathological changes in camptocormia differ from those of central core disease by lacking the type-1 fiber hypotrophy—in contrast, we observe a type-1 fiber hypertrophy—and the acid phosphatase reactivity of the lesions that cannot be seen in central core disease. In nemaline myopathy, an acid phosphatase reactivity within lesioned fibers has been described although in a completely different distribution than in camptocormia [29], even when a nemaline myopathy may be the cause of camptocormia in PD, as described in a single case [30]. With electron microscopy, numerous small autophagic vacuoles have been detected in the cores [29], which cannot be seen in camptocormia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The myopathological changes in camptocormia differ from those of central core disease by lacking the type-1 fiber hypotrophy—in contrast, we observe a type-1 fiber hypertrophy—and the acid phosphatase reactivity of the lesions that cannot be seen in central core disease. In nemaline myopathy, an acid phosphatase reactivity within lesioned fibers has been described although in a completely different distribution than in camptocormia [29], even when a nemaline myopathy may be the cause of camptocormia in PD, as described in a single case [30]. With electron microscopy, numerous small autophagic vacuoles have been detected in the cores [29], which cannot be seen in camptocormia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nemaline myopathy, an acid phosphatase reactivity within lesioned fibers has been described although in a completely different distribution than in camptocormia [29], even when a nemaline myopathy may be the cause of camptocormia in PD, as described in a single case [30]. With electron microscopy, numerous small autophagic vacuoles have been detected in the cores [29], which cannot be seen in camptocormia. Nevertheless, a degradation of proteins may take place in the muscle fiber lesions seen in camptocormia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infrequently, there is a focal increase in acid phosphatase activity in fibers, which is associated with cases with a fast evolution. This suggests a degenerative process, inducing lysosomal enzyme activation and celular destruction 13,14 . Our cases showed a predominance of type I fibers and increased acid phosphatase activity, regardless the NM clinical form.…”
Section: Fig 1 Hematoxilin-eosin (He) Stain Showing Variation In Fibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An NM diagnosis is made with a muscle biopsy in which modified Gomori-trichrome (MGT) staining shows the presence of nemaline bodies in muscle fibers in the subsarcolemmal or intermyofibrilar region 1,2,5,11,12 . The histochemistry also reveals features in NM such as a predominance of type I fibers and an increase in acid phosphatase activity 5,[12][13][14] . An immunohistochemical study of muscle proteins shows the nature of the structural failures in NM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See table 1. Six patients received no therapy (Patients 4,6,7,9,12,14). Three of these died in 2 to 5 years (Patients 4, 9, 12); one patient was stable or improved 23 years later; one was weaker 14 months later (Patient 14); and 1 was lost to follow-up (Patient 7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%